Contact force with magnetic-guided catheter ablation

被引:20
作者
Bessiere, Francis [1 ]
Zikry, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
Rivard, Lena [1 ]
Dyrda, Katia [1 ]
Khairy, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Montreal Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, 5000 Belanger St E, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, 3775 Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B4, Canada
来源
EUROPACE | 2018年 / 20卷
关键词
Magnetic-guided ablation; Contact force; Radiofrequency ablation; IRRIGATED-TIP CATHETER; CONGENITAL HEART-DISEASE; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; REMOTE; EXPERIENCE; SERIES;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euy006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Achieving adequate catheter tip-tissue contact is essential for delivering robust radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions. We measured the contact force generated by a remote magnetic-guided catheter navigation system. Methods and results A plexiglass model with an integrated scale was fashioned to mimic transvenous and retrograde access to sites in the right atrium and right and left ventricles. An 8 Fr RF ablation catheter was steered by remote magnetic guidance at fields of 0.08 and 0.10T, with and without a long sheath positioned at the entrance of the chamber. Ten contact force readings were taken at each setting, with the scale recalibrated prior to each measurement. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare contact force measurements while adjusting for the non-independent data structure. A total of 240 contact force measurements were taken. Without a long sheath, contact forces with magnetic fields of 0.10 T (n = 60) and 0.08 T (n = 60) were similar (6.1 +/- 1.4g vs. 6.0 +/- 1.3 g, P= 0.089). Contact forces were not significantly different with simulated transvenous (n = 80) and retrograde aortic (n = 40) approaches (6.2 +/- 1.4g vs. 5.7 +/- 1.2g, P= 0.132). The contact force increased substantially with a long sheath (P < 0.001) and was significantly higher with 0.10T (n = 60) vs. 0.08T (n = 60) fields (20.4 +/- 0.6 g vs. 18.0 +/- 0.5 g, P < 0.001). Conclusion Magnetic fields of 0.08 and 0.10T provide stable catheter contact forces, as reflected by the small variability between measurements. The average contact force is approximately 6g without a sheath and increases to 20g with a long sheath positioned at the entrance of the chamber of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Robotic navigation for catheter ablation: benefits and challenges [J].
Aagaard, Philip ;
Natale, Andrea ;
Di Biase, Luigi .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (04) :457-469
[2]   Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: The effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation-A prospective study [J].
Andrade, Jason G. ;
Monir, George ;
Pollak, Scott J. ;
Khairy, Paul ;
Dubuc, Marc ;
Roy, Denis ;
Talajic, Mario ;
Deyell, Marc ;
Rivard, Lena ;
Thibault, Bernard ;
Guerra, Peter G. ;
Nattel, Stanley ;
Macle, Laurent .
HEART RHYTHM, 2014, 11 (11) :1919-1924
[3]   Remote magnetic navigation to guide endocardial and epicardial catheter mapping of scar-related ventricular tachycardia [J].
Aryana, Arash ;
d'Avila, Andre ;
Heist, E. Kevin ;
Mela, Theofanie ;
Singh, Jagmeet P. ;
Ruskin, Jeremy N. ;
Reddy, Vivek Y. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (10) :1191-1200
[4]   Magnetic guidance versus manual control: comparison of radiofrequency lesion dimensions and evaluation of the effect of heart wall motion in a myocardial phantom [J].
Bhaskaran, Abhishek ;
Barry, M. A. ;
Al Raisi, Sara I. ;
Chik, William ;
Doan Trang Nguyen ;
Pouliopoulos, Jim ;
Nalliah, Chrishan ;
Hendricks, Roger ;
Thomas, Stuart ;
McEwan, Alistair L. ;
Kovoor, Pramesh ;
Thiagalingam, Aravinda .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (01) :1-8
[5]   Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Electrical modification suggesting transmurality is faster achieved with remote magnetic catheter in comparison with contact force use [J].
Bun, Sok-Sithikun ;
Ayari, Anis ;
Latcu, Decebal Gabriel ;
Errahmouni, Abdelkarim ;
Saoudi, Nadir .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (07) :745-753
[6]   Remote-Controlled Magnetic Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a New Irrigated-Tip Catheter in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [J].
Chun, K. R. Julian ;
Wissner, Erik ;
Koektuerk, Buelent ;
Konstantinidou, Melanie ;
Schmidt, Boris ;
Zerm, Thomas ;
Metzner, Andreas ;
Tilz, Roland ;
Boczor, Sigrid ;
Fuernkranz, Alexander ;
Ouyang, Feifan ;
Kuck, Karl-Heinz .
CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 3 (05) :458-464
[7]   Endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the left ventricle with the Remote Magnetic Navigation System and the 3.5-mm open irrigated magnetic catheter: Results from a large single-center case-control series [J].
Di Biase, Luigi ;
Santangeli, Pasquale ;
Astudillo, Vladimir ;
Conti, Sergio ;
Mohanty, Prasant ;
Mohanty, Sanghamitra ;
Sanchez, Javier E. ;
Horton, Rodney ;
Thomas, Barbara ;
Burkhardt, J. David ;
Natale, Andrea .
HEART RHYTHM, 2010, 7 (08) :1029-1035
[8]   Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system -: Magnetic remote catheter ablation [J].
Ernst, S ;
Ouyang, FF ;
Linder, C ;
Hertting, K ;
Stahl, F ;
Chun, J ;
Hachiya, H ;
Bänsch, D ;
Antz, M ;
Kuck, KH .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (12) :1472-1475
[9]   Initial Clinical Experience with the New Irrigated Tip Magnetic Catheter for Ablation of Scar-Related Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia: A Small Case Series [J].
Haghjoo, Majid ;
Hindricks, Gerhard ;
Bode, Kerstin ;
Piorkowski, Christopher ;
Bollmann, Andreas ;
Arya, Arash .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (08) :935-939
[10]   Remote Magnetic Navigation With Irrigated Tip Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [J].
Miyazaki, Shinsuke ;
Shah, Ashok J. ;
Xhaet, Olivier ;
Derval, Nicolas ;
Matsuo, Seiichiro ;
Wright, Matthew ;
Nault, Isabelle ;
Forclaz, Andrei ;
Jadidi, Amir S. ;
Knecht, Sebastien ;
Rivard, Lena ;
Liu, Xingpeng ;
Linton, Nick ;
Sacher, Frederic ;
Hocini, Meleze ;
Jais, Pierre ;
Haissaguerre, Michel .
CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 3 (06) :585-589