Philosophy, Religion, and Heterodoxy in the Philosophy of Henry More, Ralph Cudworth, and Anne Conway

被引:0
作者
Hutton, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
atheism; heterodoxy; Platonism; Descartes; More; Cudworth; Conway;
D O I
10.1163/18712428-10002002
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Philosophers who hold the compatibility of reason and faith, are vulnerable to the charge of opening the way to atheism and heterodoxy. This danger was particularly acute when, in the wake of Cartesianism, the philosophy of Spinoza and Hobbes necessitated a resetting of the relationship of philosophy with religion. My paper discusses three English philosophers who illustrate the difficulties for the philosophical defence for religion: Henry More, Ralph Cudworth, and Anne Conway, for all of whom philosophical and religious truth were deeply intertwined. But each of them also subscribed to heterodox religious beliefs. This raises questions of whether there is a direct the relationship between their philosophy and religious heterodoxy-whether they exemplify the charge that philosophy undermines religion, or indeed whether their defence of religion was a cover for heterodoxy.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 171
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1662, COLLECTION SEVERAL P, V2nd
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1727, OEUVRES DIVERSES
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, H MORE 1614 1687
  • [4] Berns Michael, 1692, ALTER ATHEISTEN HEYD
  • [5] Birch, 1743, TRUE INTELLECTUAL SY, pxiii
  • [6] Conway Anne, 1996, PRINCIPLES MOST ANCI, P63
  • [7] Cudworth Ralph., 1678, The True Intellectual System of the Universe: The first part, wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted and its impossibility demonstrated
  • [8] Dixon Philip., 2003, NICE HOT DISPUTES DO
  • [9] Gabbey Alan., 1982, PROBLEMS CARTESIANIS, P171
  • [10] Halyburton Th, 1714, Natural religion insufficient