Feasibility of the Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator in Retrosigmoid Vestibular Schwannoma Removal

被引:8
作者
Golub, Justin S. [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Jon D. [1 ,2 ]
Leach, James L. [3 ]
Pottschmidt, Natalie R. [1 ,2 ]
Zuccarello, Mario [4 ,5 ]
Pensak, Myles L. [1 ,2 ]
Samy, Ravi N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] UC Neurosci Inst, Neurosensory Disorders Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[5] Mayfield Clin, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
ultrasonic bone aspirator; Sonopet; bone dust; headache; retrosigmoid; vestibular schwannoma; acoustic neuroma; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1177/0194599815587485
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Postoperative headache is an undesirable consequence of retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma (VS) removal. An ultrasonic bone aspirator (UBA) may reduce headache by minimizing subarachnoid bone dust dispersion. The feasibility of removing internal auditory canal (IAC) bone with a UBA is unknown. This study assessed volume and duration of IAC bone removal in clinical and laboratory settings. Study Design: (1) Retrospective review of radiologic data and intraoperative videos. (2) Cadaveric temporal bone model. Setting: (1) Tertiary care medical center. (2) Laboratory. Subjects Methods: We calculated the volume of IAC bone drilled during retrosigmoid VS removal using postoperative computed tomography scans. We then measured the time spent actively drilling IAC bone by analyzing operative videos. Finally, we measured bone ablation rates in a cadaveric temporal bone model using a drill and UBA. Results: The mean SD volume of IAC bone removed during surgery was 0.32 +/- 0.17 mL (n = 9). The time spent actively removing IAC bone with a drill was only 10.4 +/- 3.5 minutes, less than a third of the total IAC opening time of 34.2 +/- 13.1 minutes (n = 5). On cadaveric specimens, the UBA removed bone at 0.21 +/- 0.03 or 0.35 +/- 0.07 mu L/s at 15% or 50% power, respectively (n = 4). This extrapolates to 15.0 +/- 3.0 to 25.0 +/- 3.9 minutes to remove the same 0.32 mL from surgery. Conclusions: The volume and duration of IAC bone removal during retrosigmoid VS surgery are small. Using a UBA at low power instead of a drill would extend the length of surgery by 5 to 15 minutes, with the theoretical potential for reducing headache.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach [J].
Ansari, Shaheryar F. ;
Terry, Colin ;
Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (03)
[2]  
Catalano PJ, 1996, AM J OTOL, V17, P904
[3]   Piezoelectric Round Window Osteoplasty for Vibrant Soundbridge Implant [J].
Cuda, Domenico ;
Murri, Alessandra ;
Tinelli, Nicoletta .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2009, 30 (06) :782-786
[4]   Piezoelectric bone surgery in otologic surgery [J].
Salami, Angelo ;
Vercellotti, Tommaso ;
Mora, Renzo ;
Dellepiane, Massimo .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 136 (03) :484-485
[5]   Use of a novel ultrasonic surgical system for decompression of the facial nerve [J].
Samy, Ravi N. ;
Krishnamoorthy, Kumaresh ;
Pensak, Myles L. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2007, 117 (05) :872-875
[6]   Role of Craniotomy Repair in Reducing Postoperative Headaches After a Retrosigmoid Approach [J].
Teo, Mario K. ;
Eljamel, M. Sam .
NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 67 (05) :1286-1291
[7]  
Weber JD, OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NEC