Cefixime allows greater dose escalation of oral irinotecan: A phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors

被引:53
|
作者
Furman, WL
Crews, KR
Billups, C
Wu, JR
Gajjar, AJ
Daw, NC
Patrick, CC
Rodriguez-Galindo, C
Stewart, CF
Dome, JS
Panetta, JC
Houghton, PJ
Santana, VM
机构
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[2] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[3] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Biostat, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[4] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Mol Pharmacol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[5] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm, Memphis, TN USA
[6] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Memphis, TN USA
[7] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Memphis, TN USA
[8] Miami Childrens Hosp, Miami, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2847
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Irinotecan is active against a variety of malignancies; however, severe diarrhea limits its usefulness. In our phase I study, the intravenous formulation of irinotecan was administered orally daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (repeated every 21 days) to children with refractory solid tumors. Our objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of oral irinotecan and to evaluate whether coadministration of cefixime (8 mg/kg/d beginning 5 days before irinotecan and continuing throughout the course) ameliorates irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Patients and Methods In separate cohorts, irinotecan doses were escalated from 15 to 45 mg/m(2)/d without cefixime and then from 45 to 60 and 75 mg/m(2)/d with cefixime. Results Without cefixime, diarrhea was dose limiting at irinotecan 45 mg/m(2)/d. Myelotoxicity was not significant at any dose. The MTD was 40 mg/m(2)/d without cefixime but 60 mg/m(2)/d with cefixime. Systemic exposure to SN-38 at the MTD was significantly higher with cefixime than without cefixime (mean SN-38 area under the curve: 19.5 ng x h/mL; standard deviation [SD], 6.8 ng x h/mL v 10.4 ng x h/mL; SD, 4.3 ng x h/mL, respectively; P = .030). Conclusion Cefixime administered with oral irinotecan is well tolerated in children and allows greater dose escalation of irinotecan. Because diarrhea is a major adverse effect of both intravenous and oral irinotecan, further evaluation of the use of cefixime to ameliorate this adverse effect is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 570
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dose escalation of intravenous irinotecan using oral cefpodoxime: A phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors
    McGregor, Lisa M.
    Stewart, Clinton F.
    Crews, Kristine R.
    Tagen, Michael
    Wozniak, Amy
    Wu, Jianrong
    McCarville, M. Beth
    Navid, Fariba
    Santana, Victor M.
    Houghton, Peter J.
    Furman, Wayne L.
    Galindo, Carlos Rodriguez
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2012, 58 (03) : 372 - 379
  • [2] Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors
    R. C. Brennan
    W. Furman
    S. Mao
    J. Wu
    D. C. Turner
    C. F. Stewart
    V. Santana
    L. M. McGregor
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2014, 74 : 1191 - 1198
  • [3] Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors
    Brennan, R. C.
    Furman, W.
    Mao, S.
    Wu, J.
    Turner, D. C.
    Stewart, C. F.
    Santana, V.
    McGregor, L. M.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 74 (06) : 1191 - 1198
  • [4] A phase I study of cetuximab and irinotecan in pediatric patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors
    Trippett, T. M.
    Kuttesch, J.
    Herzog, C.
    Boklan, J.
    Bagatell, R.
    Hunger, S.
    Arceci, R.
    Lu, H.
    Langer, C.
    Gore, L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [5] A phase I study of gefitinib and irinotecan (IRN) in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.
    Furman, WL
    Daw, NC
    Crews, KR
    Stewart, CF
    McCarville, B
    Santana, VM
    Hawkins, D
    Rodriguez-Galindo, C
    Navid, F
    Houghton, PJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 804S - 804S
  • [6] Phase I Study of Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients with Recurrent/Refractory Solid Tumors
    Okada, Keiko
    Yamasaki, Kai
    Tanaka, Chika
    Fujisaki, Hiroyuki
    Osugi, Yuko
    Hara, Junichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 43 (11) : 1073 - 1079
  • [7] Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Gemcitabine plus Irinotecan in Advanced Solid Tumors
    Dugan, Elizabeth
    Truax, Roxanne
    Meadows, Kellen L.
    Blobe, Gerald C.
    Morse, Michael A.
    Fernando, Nishan H.
    Gockerman, Jon P.
    Petros, William P.
    Hurwitz, Herbert I.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 29 (12) : 5149 - 5153
  • [8] A phase I dose escalation study of selenomethionine (SLM) in combination with fixed dose irinotecan (Iri) in patients with solid tumors
    Rustum, Y.
    Pendyala, L.
    Creaven, P.
    Ross, M.
    Brady, W.
    Badmaev, V.
    Prey, J.
    Fakih, M. G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [9] Phase 1 Study of Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors
    McGregor, Lisa M.
    Spunt, Sheri L.
    Furman, Wayne L.
    Stewart, Clinton F.
    Schaiquevich, Paula
    Krailo, Mark D.
    Speights, RoseAnne
    Ivy, Percy
    Adamson, Peter C.
    Blaney, Susan M.
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (08) : 1765 - 1775
  • [10] Phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors
    Mugishima, H
    Matsunaga, T
    Yagi, K
    Asami, K
    Mimaya, J
    Suita, S
    Kishimoto, T
    Sawada, T
    Tsuchida, Y
    Kaneko, M
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2002, 24 (02) : 94 - 100