Noise Provides New Insights on Contrast Sensitivity Function

被引:26
作者
Chen, Ge [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Fang [3 ]
Yan, Fang-Fang [1 ]
Zhang, Pan [1 ]
Xi, Jie [1 ]
Zhou, Yifeng [4 ,5 ]
Lu, Zhong-Lin [3 ]
Huang, Chang-Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ctr Cognit & Brain Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Brain Funct & Dis, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Life Sci, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION; SPATIAL-FREQUENCY; LETTER IDENTIFICATION; PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION; AMBLYOPIA; VISION; ORIENTATION; MECHANISMS; LUMINANCE; GRATINGS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0090579
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sensitivity to luminance difference, or contrast sensitivity, is critical for animals to survive in and interact with the external world. The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), which measures visual sensitivity to spatial patterns over a wide range of spatial frequencies, provides a comprehensive characterization of the visual system. Despite its popularity and significance in both basic research and clinical practice, it hasn't been clear what determines the CSF and how the factors underlying the CSF change in different conditions. In the current study, we applied the external noise method and perceptual template model to a wide range of external noise and spatial frequency (SF) conditions, and evaluated how the various sources of observer inefficiency changed with SF and determined the limiting factors underlying the CSF. We found that only internal additive noise and template gain changed significantly with SF, while the transducer non-linearity and coefficient for multiplicative noise were constant. The 12-parameter model provided a very good account of all the data in the 200 tested conditions (86.5%, 86.2%, 89.5%, and 96.4% for the four subjects, respectively). Our results suggest a re-consideration of the popular spatial vision model that employs the CSF as the front-end filter and constant internal additive noise across spatial frequencies. The study will also be of interest to scientists and clinicians engaged in characterizing spatial vision deficits and/or developing rehabilitation methods to restore spatial vision in clinical populations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   OPTICAL AND PHOTORECEPTOR IMMATURITIES LIMIT THE SPATIAL AND CHROMATIC VISION OF HUMAN NEONATES [J].
BANKS, MS ;
BENNETT, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (12) :2059-2079
[2]   THE PHYSICAL LIMITS OF GRATING VISIBILITY [J].
BANKS, MS ;
GEISLER, WS ;
BENNETT, PJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1987, 27 (11) :1915-1924
[3]   RETINAL NOISE AND ABSOLUTE THRESHOLD [J].
BARLOW, HB .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1956, 46 (08) :634-639
[4]   Luminance and chromatic contrast sensitivity in dyslexia: the magnocellular deficit hypothesis revisited [J].
Bednarek, DB ;
Grabowska, A .
NEUROREPORT, 2002, 13 (18) :2521-2525
[5]   ON EXISTENCE OF NEURONES IN HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM SELECTIVELY SENSITIVE TO ORIENTATION AND SIZE OF RETINAL IMAGES [J].
BLAKEMORE, C ;
CAMPBELL, FW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1969, 203 (01) :237-+
[6]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[7]   Seeing Gray When Feeling Blue? Depression Can Be Measured in the Eye of the Diseased [J].
Bubl, Emanuel ;
Kern, Elena ;
Ebert, Dieter ;
Bach, Michael ;
van Elst, Ludger Tebartz .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 68 (02) :205-208
[8]  
Burgess A., 1979, PROC SOC PHOTOO PT I, V173, P34, DOI DOI 10.1117/12.957121
[9]   VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .4. OBSERVER INCONSISTENCY [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
COLBORNE, B .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (04) :617-627
[10]   Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity [J].
Cameron, EL ;
Tai, JC ;
Carrasco, M .
VISION RESEARCH, 2002, 42 (08) :949-967