Assessing the Risk of Australian Indigenous Sexual Offenders Reoffending: A Review of the Research Literature and Court Decisions

被引:9
作者
Allan, Alfred [1 ]
Parry, Catherine L. [1 ]
Ferrante, Anna [2 ]
Gillies, Christine [3 ]
Griffiths, Catherine S. [4 ]
Morgan, Francis [3 ,4 ]
Spiranovic, Caroline [3 ,5 ]
Smallbone, Stephen [6 ]
Tubex, Hilde [5 ]
Wong, Stephen C. P. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Arts & Humanities, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, PHRN Ctr Data Linkage, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Law, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Law Sch, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] Griffith Univ, Griffith Criminol Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Psychol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[8] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Forens Behav Sci, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
assessment; detention; indigenous; preventative; reoffending; risk; sexual; PREVENTIVE DETENTION; LEVEL; PSYCHOLOGY; ETHNICITY; ETHICS; CHALLENGES; ACCURACY; VALIDITY; VERSION; GENDER;
D O I
10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The assessment of offenders' risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders' risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners' evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 294
页数:21
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Prediction of the risk of male sexual reoffending in Australia [J].
Allan, A ;
Dawson, D ;
Allan, MM .
AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (01) :60-68
[2]  
Allan A., 2002, DEV UNIQUE RISK VIOL
[3]  
Allan A., WILEY INT HDB CORREC
[4]  
Allan A, 2016, 26 ANN C EUR ASS PSY
[5]  
Allan A., 2004, ASSESSMENT RISK REOF
[6]  
Allan A, 2017, ROUT INT HANDB, P269
[7]   Moral Challenges for Psychologists Working in Psychology and Law [J].
Allan, Alfred .
PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2018, 25 (03) :485-499
[8]   Ethics in Psychology and Law: An International Perspective [J].
Allan, Alfred .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 25 (06) :443-457
[9]   Ethical Principles and the Communication of Forensic Mental Health Assessments [J].
Allan, Alfred ;
Grisso, Thomas .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 24 (06) :467-477