Cost Analysis of Adjunctive Hydrocortisone Therapy for Septic Shock: US Payer Perspective

被引:2
|
作者
Oh, Mok [1 ]
Patanwala, Asad E. [2 ,3 ]
Alkhatib, Nimer [4 ]
Almutairi, Abdulaali [1 ,5 ]
Abraham, Ivo [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Erstad, Brian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & PharmacoEcon Res, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Pharm, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Al Zaytoonah Univ Jordan, Coll Pharm, Amman, Jordan
[5] Saudi Food & Drug Author, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, 1295 N Martin,POB 210202, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[7] Univ Arizona, Coll Med Tucson, Dept Family & Community Med, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Septic; Shock; Adjunctive Hydrocortisone; Cost; budget impact; SEPSIS; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000004501
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To conduct a cost analysis of adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy for severe septic shock from the perspective of a third-party payer in the United States. Design: Estimates of outcomes were aggregate data from the Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock and Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock trials. In these trials, the outcomes of interests were ICU length of stay, vasopressor-free days, ventilation-free days, and the proportion of patients receiving blood transfusion. Each outcome was monetized into a set of mutually exclusive components and was aggregated to estimate the cost-per-patient based on each trial. Cost inputs for each outcome were obtained from literature and adjusted based on the medical care consumer price index. To estimate the budget impact using adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy, per-patient avoided cost was multiplied by expected septic shock annual incidence. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis evaluated the robustness of the findings, and Monte Carlo simulation estimated 95% CI of the findings. Setting: A total of 103 medical-surgical ICU (69 for Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock and 34 for Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock). Patients: Adults greater than or equal to 18 years old with septic shock. Interventions: Adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy (hydrocortisone at a dose of 200 mg/d for 7 d for Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock and hydrocortisone at a 50 mg IV bolus every 6 hr and fludrocortisone as a 50 mu g tablet once daily). Measurements and Main Results: Per Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock, adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy showed a 90-day monetized benefit of $8,111 (95% CI, $3,914-$12,307) per patient, driven by improvements in ICU-free days, vasopressor-free days, ventilation-free days, and blood transfusion proportion. The total estimated annual impact of adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy, in 2019 dollars, was $750 million. Per Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock, adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy showed a 90-day monetized benefit of $25,539 per patient (95% CI, $22,853-$28,224), driven by improvements in ICU free-days, vasopressor-free days, and ventilation-free days. The total estimated annual impact of adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy, in 2019 dollars, was $2.3 billion. The deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis showed the cost of ICU stays to be the most influential factor in both analyses. The sensitivity analysis using the reported median showed a greater monetized benefit of $10,658 (Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock) and $30,911 (Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock) per patient. Conclusions: Using adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy yields a significant monetized benefit based on inputs from the Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock and Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock trials.
引用
收藏
页码:E906 / E911
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hydrocortisone and the reduction of vasopressors in septic shock: therapy or only chart cosmetics?
    J. Briegel
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2000, 26 : 1723 - 1726
  • [22] EVALUATION OF HYDROCORTISONE THERAPY FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS IN REAL LIFE PRACTICE
    Petnak, Tananchai
    Tangsujaritvijit, Viratch
    Karnjanarachata, Cherdkiat
    Dilokpattanamonkol, Pitchaya
    RESPIROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 121 - 121
  • [23] Influences of hydrocortisone therapy on arginine vasopressin plasma levels in septic shock
    Jochberger, Stefan
    Duenser, Martin W.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2011, 123 (7-8) : 245 - 247
  • [24] Hydrocortisone and the reduction of vasopressors in septic shock: therapy or only chart cosmetics?
    Briegel, J
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 26 (12) : 1723 - 1726
  • [25] Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of hydrocortisone therapy in cancer patients with septic shock
    Nazer, Lama
    AlNajjar, Taghreed
    Al-Shaer, Mohammad
    Rimawi, Dalia
    Hawari, Feras
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [26] RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF VITAMIN C, HYDROCORTISONE, AND THIAMINE IN SEPTIC SHOCK
    Litwak, Jane
    Cho, Nam
    Moussavi, Kayvan
    Nguyen, H. Bryant
    Bushell, Thomas
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47
  • [27] A cost-benefit analysis of smoking cessation prescription coverage from a US payer perspective
    Baker, Christine L.
    Ding, Yao
    Ferrufino, Cheryl P.
    Kowal, Stacey
    Tan, Jenen
    Subedi, Prasun
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 359 - 370
  • [28] Denosumab for Elderly Men with Osteoporosis: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis from the US Payer Perspective
    Parthan, Anju
    Kruse, Morgan
    Agodoa, Irene
    Silverman, Stuart
    Orwoll, Eric
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2013, 28
  • [29] A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS COMPARING OBESITY DRUG TREATMENTS FROM A US PAYER PERSPECTIVE
    Gomez-Lumbreras, A.
    Tan, M. S.
    Zapata, Villa L.
    Ilham, S.
    Earl, J. C.
    Malone, D. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S335 - S335
  • [30] Denosumab for Elderly Men with Osteoporosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the US Payer Perspective
    Silverman, Stuart
    Agodoa, Irene
    Kruse, Morgan
    Parthan, Anju
    Orwoll, Eric
    JOURNAL OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2015, 2015