Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA

被引:48
|
作者
Kumar, Sandeep [1 ]
Lal, Rattan [2 ]
Liu, Desheng [3 ,4 ]
Rafiq, Rashid [5 ]
机构
[1] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Carbon Management & Sequestrat Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Geog, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Stat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Microbiol & Plant Biol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
geographically weighted regression; multiple linear regression; major land resource areas; root mean square error; soil organic carbon; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; GLOBAL CLIMATE-CHANGE; TERRAIN ATTRIBUTES; PREDICTION; VARIABILITY; PATTERNS; IMPACTS; STORAGE; FLOOR; BULK;
D O I
10.1007/s11442-013-1010-1
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Historical database of National Soil Survey Center containing 1424 geo-referenced soil profiles was used in this study for estimating the organic carbon (SOC) for the soils of Ohio, USA. Specific objective of the study was to estimate the spatial distribution of SOC density (C stock per unit area) to 1.0-m depth for soils of Ohio using geographically weighted regression (GWR), and compare the results with that obtained from multiple linear regression (MLR). About 80% of the analytical data were used for calibration and 20% for validation. A total of 20 variables including terrain attributes, climate data, bedrock geology, and land use data were used for mapping the SOC density. Results showed that the GWR provided better estimations with the lowest (3.81 kg m(-2)) root mean square error (RMSE) than MLR approach. Total estimated SOC pool for soils in Ohio ranged from 727 to 742 Tg. This study demonstrates that, the local spatial statistical technique, the GWR can perform better in capturing the spatial distribution of SOC across the study region as compared to other global spatial statistical techniques such as MLR. Thus, GWR enhances the accuracy for mapping SOC density.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 296
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA
    Sandeep Kumar
    Rattan Lal
    Desheng Liu
    Rashid Rafiq
    Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013, 23 : 280 - 296
  • [2] Estimating spatial distribution of soil organic carbon for the Midwestern United States using historical database
    Kumar, Sandeep
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2015, 127 : 49 - 57
  • [3] A multi-factor weighted regression approach for estimating the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in grasslands
    Wang, SuiZi
    Fan, JiangWen
    Zhong, HuaPing
    Li, YuZhe
    Zhu, HuaZhong
    Qiao, YuXin
    Zhang, HaiYan
    CATENA, 2019, 174 : 248 - 258
  • [4] Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in apple orchard soils of Kashmir Himalaya, India
    Dad, Javaid M.
    ul Shafiq, Mifta
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (05) : 485 - 498
  • [5] Organic carbon stocks in grassland soils and their spatial distribution in Japan
    Matsuura, Shoji
    Sasaki, Hiroyuki
    Kohyama, Kazunori
    GRASSLAND SCIENCE, 2012, 58 (02) : 79 - 93
  • [6] Effects of land use and topography on spatial variety of soil organic carbon density in a hilly, subtropical catchment of China
    Liu, Huanyao
    Zhou, Jiaogen
    Feng, Qingyu
    Li, Yuyuan
    Li, Yong
    Wu, Jinshui
    SOIL RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (02) : 134 - 144
  • [7] Spatial distribution dependency of soil organic carbon content to important environmental variables
    Mirchooli, Fahimeh
    Kiani-Harchegani, Mahboobeh
    Darvishan, Abdulvahed Khaledi
    Falahatkar, Samereh
    Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 116
  • [8] Spatial variation and distribution of soil organic carbon in an urban ecosystem from high-density sampling
    Zhang, Pingping
    Wang, Yunqiang
    Sun, Hui
    Qi, Lijun
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Zhe
    CATENA, 2021, 204
  • [9] Comparison of methods for determining organic carbon content of urban soils in Central Ohio
    Hernandez, Tania D. Burgos
    Slater, Brian K.
    Shaffer, Jared M.
    Basta, Nicholas
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2023, 34
  • [10] Influence of Land Use and Topographic Factors on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks and Their Spatial and Vertical Distribution
    Blackburn, Kyle W.
    Libohova, Zamir
    Adhikari, Kabindra
    Kome, Charles
    Maness, Xander
    Silman, Miles R.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (12)