Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

被引:66
|
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ]
Feng, Yuan [2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Zhuang, Minjie [1 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ]
Wang, Feng [4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Coll Stomatol,Sch Med,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol,S, Chinese Acad Med Sci,Res Unit Oral & Maxillofacia, Natl Ctr Stomatol,Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Dept, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Room 805,Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral Implantol,Sch Med,Res Unit Oral & Maxil, Chinese Acad Med Sci,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol,Sh, Coll Stomatol,Natl Ctr Stomatol,Natl Clin Res Ctr, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Accuracy; Computer-assisted surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; Phantom study; CURRENT STATE; PLACEMENT; METAANALYSIS; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a dynamic navigation and a robotic system. Methods: Eighty three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms, including edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, were assigned to two groups: a dynamic navigation system (Beidou-SNS) group and a robotic system (Hybrid Robotic System for Dental Implant Surgery, HRS-DIS) group. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the implants in 3D world were measured after pre-operative plans and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was applied, and a p value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 480 implants were placed in 80 phantoms. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation system and robotic system groups showed a mean (+/- SD) entry deviation of 0.96 +/- 0.57 mm vs. 0.83 +/- 0.55 mm (p=0.04), a mean exit deviation of 1.06 +/- 0.59 mm vs. 0.91 +/- 0.56 mm (p=0.04), and a mean angle deviation of 2.41 +/- 1.42 degrees vs. 1 +/- 0.48 degrees (p<0.00). Conclusions: The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that this prototype robotic system (HRS-DIS) could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
    Pinter, Gabor Tamas
    Decker, Roland
    Szenasi, Gabor
    Barabas, Peter
    Huszar, Tamas
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2022, (187):
  • [42] Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future
    Sun, Ting-Mao
    Lan, Ting-Hsun
    Pan, Chin-Yun
    Lee, Huey-Er
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 34 (01) : 56 - 64
  • [43] Accuracy and Self-Confidence Level of Freehand Drilling and Dynamic Navigation System of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Mampilly, Mathew
    Kuruvilla, Leelamma
    Niyazi, Adham Abdulmajeed Tash
    Shyam, Arun
    Thomas, Pallavi Ammu
    Ali, Anzil S.
    Pullishery, Fawaz
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [44] Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study
    Feng, Yuzhang
    Yao, Yufei
    Yang, Xingmei
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (05) : 731 - 737
  • [45] Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in partial edentulism: A pilot clinical study
    Wang, MiaoZhen
    Liu, Feng
    Yu, Tao
    Zhan, Yalin
    Ma, Feifei
    Rausch-Fan, Xiaohui
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (07)
  • [46] Accuracy and Deviation Analysis of Static and Robotic Guided Implant Surgery: A Case Study
    Mozer, Paul S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (05) : E86 - E90
  • [47] In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery
    He, Jin
    Zhang, Qinmeng
    Wang, Xueting
    Fu, Mengdie
    Zhang, Hui
    Song, Luyao
    Pu, Rui
    Jiang, Zhiwei
    Yang, Guoli
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (02) : 385 - 401
  • [48] Accuracy of automatic and manual dynamic navigation registration techniques for dental implant surgery in posterior sites missing a single tooth: A retrospective clinical analysis
    Wu, Bin-Zhang
    Xue, Fei
    Ma, Yu
    Sun, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (03) : 221 - 232
  • [49] Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Lerner, Henriette
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [50] Exploring Augmented Reality for Dental Implant Surgery: Feasibility of Using Smartphones as Navigation Tools
    Mosch, Richard
    Alevizakos, Vasilios
    Stroebele, Dragan Alexander
    Schiller, Marcus
    von See, Constantin
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 11 (01):