Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

被引:64
|
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ]
Feng, Yuan [2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Zhuang, Minjie [1 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ]
Wang, Feng [4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Coll Stomatol,Sch Med,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol,S, Chinese Acad Med Sci,Res Unit Oral & Maxillofacia, Natl Ctr Stomatol,Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Dept, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Room 805,Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral Implantol,Sch Med,Res Unit Oral & Maxil, Chinese Acad Med Sci,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol,Sh, Coll Stomatol,Natl Ctr Stomatol,Natl Clin Res Ctr, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Accuracy; Computer-assisted surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; Phantom study; CURRENT STATE; PLACEMENT; METAANALYSIS; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a dynamic navigation and a robotic system. Methods: Eighty three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms, including edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, were assigned to two groups: a dynamic navigation system (Beidou-SNS) group and a robotic system (Hybrid Robotic System for Dental Implant Surgery, HRS-DIS) group. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the implants in 3D world were measured after pre-operative plans and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was applied, and a p value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 480 implants were placed in 80 phantoms. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation system and robotic system groups showed a mean (+/- SD) entry deviation of 0.96 +/- 0.57 mm vs. 0.83 +/- 0.55 mm (p=0.04), a mean exit deviation of 1.06 +/- 0.59 mm vs. 0.91 +/- 0.56 mm (p=0.04), and a mean angle deviation of 2.41 +/- 1.42 degrees vs. 1 +/- 0.48 degrees (p<0.00). Conclusions: The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that this prototype robotic system (HRS-DIS) could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study
    Struwe, Maximilian
    Leontiev, Wadim
    Connert, Thomas
    Kuhl, Sebastian
    Filippi, Andreas
    Herber, Valentin
    Dagassan-Berndt, Dorothea
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (03) : 196 - 208
  • [32] Comparison of the positional accuracy of robotic guided dental implant placement with static guided and dynamic navigation systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khan, Madiha
    Javed, Faizan
    Haji, Zainab
    Ghafoor, Robia
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (04): : 746e1 - 746e8
  • [33] Assessment of the Accuracy of Two Different Dynamic Navigation System Registration Methods for Dental Implant Placement in the Posterior Area: An In Vitro Study
    Wei, Tai
    Ma, Feifei
    Sun, Feng
    Ma, Yu
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [34] Comparison of the Accuracy of Pilot Drill-Guided and Fully Guided Implant Surgery With Dynamic Navigation: In Vitro Model Study
    Bilge, Suheyb
    Demetoglu, Umut
    Aslan, Senol
    Simsek, Hasan Onur
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2025, 51 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [35] Analysis of the accuracy of a dynamic navigation system when performing dental implant surgery with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A pilot study
    Wu, Bin-Zhang
    Ma, Fei-Fei
    Sun, Feng
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (04) : 1747 - 1755
  • [36] Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study
    Takacs, Anna
    Marada, Gyula
    Turzo, Kinga
    Nagy, Akos
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    Kivovics, Marton
    Muhl, Attila
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [37] Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study
    Anna Takács
    Gyula Marada
    Kinga Turzó
    Ákos Nagy
    Orsolya Németh
    Eitan Mijiritsky
    Márton Kivovics
    Attila Mühl
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [38] Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement
    Wu, Dong
    Zhou, Lin
    Yang, Jin
    Zhang, Bao
    Lin, Yanjun
    Chen, Jiang
    Huang, Wenxiu
    Chen, Yonghui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [39] Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement
    Dong Wu
    Lin Zhou
    Jin Yang
    Bao Zhang
    Yanjun Lin
    Jiang Chen
    Wenxiu Huang
    Yonghui Chen
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
  • [40] Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation
    Emery, Robert W.
    Merritt, Scott A.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Gibbs, Jason D.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2016, 42 (05) : 399 - 405