Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

被引:66
|
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ]
Feng, Yuan [2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Zhuang, Minjie [1 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ]
Wang, Feng [4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Coll Stomatol,Sch Med,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol,S, Chinese Acad Med Sci,Res Unit Oral & Maxillofacia, Natl Ctr Stomatol,Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Dept, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Room 805,Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral Implantol,Sch Med,Res Unit Oral & Maxil, Chinese Acad Med Sci,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol,Sh, Coll Stomatol,Natl Ctr Stomatol,Natl Clin Res Ctr, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Accuracy; Computer-assisted surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; Phantom study; CURRENT STATE; PLACEMENT; METAANALYSIS; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a dynamic navigation and a robotic system. Methods: Eighty three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms, including edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, were assigned to two groups: a dynamic navigation system (Beidou-SNS) group and a robotic system (Hybrid Robotic System for Dental Implant Surgery, HRS-DIS) group. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the implants in 3D world were measured after pre-operative plans and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was applied, and a p value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 480 implants were placed in 80 phantoms. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation system and robotic system groups showed a mean (+/- SD) entry deviation of 0.96 +/- 0.57 mm vs. 0.83 +/- 0.55 mm (p=0.04), a mean exit deviation of 1.06 +/- 0.59 mm vs. 0.91 +/- 0.56 mm (p=0.04), and a mean angle deviation of 2.41 +/- 1.42 degrees vs. 1 +/- 0.48 degrees (p<0.00). Conclusions: The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that this prototype robotic system (HRS-DIS) could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation
    Block, Michael S.
    Emery, Robert W.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Ryan, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [22] Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study
    Pei, Xiyan
    Weng, Jinlong
    Sun, Feng
    Ma, Yu
    Iao, Siniong
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [23] Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
    Adams, Coleman R.
    Ammoun, Rami
    Deeb, George R.
    Bencharit, Sompop
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (01): : 62 - 70
  • [24] Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system versus static guide-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective clinical study
    Jia, Shasha
    Wang, Guowei
    Zhao, Yimin
    Wang, Xiaojing
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (03) : 771 - 779
  • [25] Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study
    Struwe, Maximilian
    Leontiev, Wadim
    Connert, Thomas
    Kuhl, Sebastian
    Filippi, Andreas
    Herber, Valentin
    Dagassan-Berndt, Dorothea
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (03) : 196 - 208
  • [26] Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study
    Li, Ping
    Chen, Jiahao
    Li, An
    Luo, Ke
    Xu, Shulan
    Yang, Shuo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (12) : 1428 - 1437
  • [27] Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mai, Hang-Nga
    Dam, Van Viet
    Lee, Du-Hyeong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [28] Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed noninvasive adhesive marker for dynamic navigation implant surgery in a maxillary edentulous model: An in vitro study
    Lan, Kengliang
    Tao, Baoxin
    Wang, Feng
    Wu, Yiqun
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2022, 103
  • [29] Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study
    Li, Ping
    Zhao, Chunhui
    Chen, Jiahao
    Xu, Shulan
    Yang, Shuo
    Li, An
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (06) : 1279 - 1288
  • [30] A registration-and-fixation approach with handpiece adjustment for dynamic navigation in dental implant surgery
    Wu, Bin-Zhang
    Sun, Feng
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (09)