Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study

被引:31
作者
Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan [1 ]
Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle [2 ]
van der Wal, Raymond A. [1 ]
Wolff, Andre P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol Pain & Palliat Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Inst Qual Assurance & Patient Safety, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Pain Ctr, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
TEAM CLIMATE INVENTORY; OPERATING-ROOM; CHECKLIST; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018367
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study was carried out to improve patient safety in the operating theatre by the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, which focused on an optimal collaboration between surgical team members. Design A prospective intervention study with one pretest and two post-test measurements: 1 month before and 4 months and 2.5 years after the implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing, respectively. Setting Operating theatres of a tertiary care hospital with 875 beds in the Netherlands. Participants All members of five surgical teams participated in the perioperative briefing and debriefing. Intervention The implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing from July 2012 to January 2014. Primary and secondary outcomes The primary outcome was changes in the team climate, measured by the Team Climate Inventory. Secondary outcomes were the experiences of surgical teams with perioperative briefing and debriefing, measured with a structured questionnaire, and the duration of the briefings, measured by an independent observer. Results Two and a half years after the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, the team climate increased statistically significant (p=0.05). Members of the five surgical teams strongly agreed with the positive influence of perioperative briefing and debriefing on clear agreements and reminding one another of the agreements of the day. They perceived a higher efficiency of the surgical programme with more operations starting on time and less unexpectedly long operation time. The perioperative briefing took less than 4 min to conduct. Conclusions Perioperative briefing and debriefing improved the team climate of surgical teams and the efficiency of their work within the operating theatre with acceptable duration per briefing. Surgical teams with alternating team compositions have the most benefit of briefing and debriefing.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Introducing The Productive Operating Theatre Programme in Urology Theatre Suites
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Khan, Nuzhath
    Anderson, Deirdre
    Watkiss, Jonathan
    Challacombe, Ben
    Khan, Mohammed Shamim
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Cahill, Declan
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (04) : 417 - 421
  • [2] Preoperative Surgical Briefings Do Not Delay Operating Room Start Times and Are Popular With Surgical Team Members
    Ali, Muhammad
    Osborne, Alan
    Bethune, Rob
    Pullyblank, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2011, 7 (03) : 139 - 143
  • [3] Anderson NR, 1998, J ORGAN BEHAV, V19, P235, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-C
  • [5] Asscheman H., 2013, Monitor Zorggerelateerde Schade 2011/2012: dossieronderzoek in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen
  • [6] Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training
    Awad, SS
    Fagan, SP
    Bellows, C
    Albo, D
    Green-Rashad, B
    De La Garza, M
    Berger, DH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (05) : 770 - 774
  • [7] Debriefing: the forgotten phase of the surgical safety checklist
    Bartz-Kurycki, Marisa A.
    Anderson, Kathryn T.
    Abraham, Jocelyn E.
    Masada, Kendall M.
    Wang, Jiasen
    Kawaguchi, Akemi L.
    Lally, Kevin P.
    Tsao, KuoJen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 213 : 222 - 227
  • [8] Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study
    Campbell, SM
    Hann, M
    Hacker, J
    Burns, C
    Oliver, D
    Thapar, A
    Mead, N
    Safran, DG
    Roland, MO
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7316): : 784 - 787
  • [9] The role of team climate in improving the quality of chronic care delivery: a longitudinal study among professionals working with chronically ill adolescents in transitional care programmes
    Cramm, Jane M.
    Strating, Mathilde M. H.
    Nieboer, Anna P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (05):
  • [10] Response Audit of an Internet Survey of Health Care Providers and Administrators: Implications for Determination of Response Rates
    Dobrow, Mark J.
    Orchard, Margo C.
    Golden, Brian
    Holowaty, Eric
    Paszat, Lawrence
    Brown, Adalsteinn D.
    Sullivan, Terrence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (04)