共 50 条
Organophosphate and brominated flame retardants in Australian indoor environments: Levels, sources, and preliminary assessment of human exposure
被引:135
|作者:
He, Chang
[1
]
Wang, Xianyu
[1
]
Phong Thai
[2
]
Baduel, Christine
[1
,3
]
Gallen, Christie
[1
]
Banks, Andrew
[1
]
Bainton, Paul
[4
]
English, Karin
[5
,6
]
Mueller, Jochen F.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Queensland, QAEHS, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Int Lab Air Qual & Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Inst Sci Analyt, CNRS,ENS Lyon,UMR 5280, 5 Rue Doua, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France
[4] Dept Environm & Energy, GPO Box 787, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Child Hlth Res Ctr, Childrens Hlth & Environm Program, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金:
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词:
OPFRs;
PBDEs;
Alternative flame retardants;
Indoor dust and air;
Plasticizer;
POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS;
IN-HOUSE DUST;
PASSIVE AIR;
ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS;
GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY;
CONSUMER PRODUCTS;
OUTDOOR AIR;
PHASE-OUT;
PBDES;
PLASTICIZERS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.017
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Concentrations of nine organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) and eight polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were measured in samples of indoor dust (n = 85) and air (n = 45) from Australian houses, offices, hotels, and transportation (buses, trains, and aircraft). All target compounds were detected in indoor dust and air samples. Median Sigma(9)OPFRs concentrations were 40 gig in dust and 44 ng/m(3) in indoor air, while median Sigma 8PBDEs concentrations were 2.1 mu g/g and 0.049 ng/m(3). Concentrations of FRs were higher in rooms that contained carpet, air conditioners, and various electronic items. Estimated daily intakes in adults are 14000 pg/kg body weight/day and 330 pg/kg body weight/day for Sigma(9)OPFRs and Sigma 8PBDEs, respectively. Our results suggest that for the volatile FRs such as tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and TCIPP, inhalation is expected to be the more important intake pathway compared to dust ingestion and dermal contact. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 679
页数:10
相关论文