Quasi-Newton full-waveform inversion with a projected Hessian matrix

被引:1
|
作者
Ma, Yong [1 ]
Hale, Dave [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Ctr Wave Phenomena, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
SUBSPACE METHODS; GAUSS-NEWTON; SCALE; TOMOGRAPHY; ALGORITHMS; KERNELS; MODELS; NORM;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2011-0519.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We present a method, in realistic-size full-waveform inversion (FWI), to explicitly construct a projected Hessian matrix and its inverse matrix, which we subsequently used to solve FWI with a quasi-Newton method. Newton's method is practically unfeasible in solving realistic-size FWI problems because of the prohibitive cost (computing time and memory consumption) of calculating the Hessian matrix and the inverse Hessian. Therefore, the Gauss-Newton method and various quasi-Newton methods are proposed to approximate a Hessian matrix. Particularly, current quasi-Newton FWI (QNFWI) commonly uses the limited-memory BFGS (L-BFGS) method, which, however, only implicitly approximates an inverse Hessian. We repose FWI as a sparse optimization problem in a sparse model space, which contains substantially fewer model parameters that are constrained by structures of the model. With respect to fewer parameters in the sparse model, we can avoid the "limited-memory" approximation and are able to explicitly compute and store a projected Hessian matrix that saves the computational time and required memory. We constructed such a projected Hessian matrix by adapting the classic BFGS method to a projected BFGS (P-BFGS) method in the sparse space. Using the projected Hessian matrix and its inverse, we can apply the P-BFGS method to solve FWI with a quasi-Newton method. In QNFWI with P-BFGS because we invert for a sparse model with much fewer parameters, the memory required to compute the projected Hessian is negligible compared to either forward modeling or gradient calculation. QNFWI with P-BFGS converges in fewer iterations than conjugate-gradient based methods and QNFWI with L-BFGS.
引用
收藏
页码:R207 / R216
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An application of full-waveform inversion to land data using the pseudo-Hessian matrix
    Zheng, Yikang
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Yibo
    Xue, Qingfeng
    Chang, Xu
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2016, 4 (04): : T627 - T635
  • [2] Use of prismatic waves in full-waveform inversion with the exact Hessian
    Liu, Yuzhu
    Wu, Zheng
    Kang, Hao
    Yang, Jizhong
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (04) : R325 - R337
  • [3] Memoryless quasi-Newton (MLQN) method for 2D acoustic full waveform inversion
    Liu, Cai
    Gao, Fengxia
    Feng, Xuan
    Liu, Yang
    Ren, Qianci
    EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 46 (02) : 168 - 177
  • [4] Evolutionary full-waveform inversion
    van Herwaarden, Dirk Philip
    Afanasiev, Michael
    Thrastarson, Solvi
    Fichtner, Andreas
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 224 (01) : 306 - 311
  • [5] l1-Regularized full-waveform inversion with prior model information based on orthant-wise limited memory quasi-Newton method
    Dai, Meng-Xue
    Chen, Jing-Bo
    Cao, Jian
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 142 : 49 - 57
  • [6] Advancing attenuation estimation through integration of the Hessian in multiparameter viscoacoustic full-waveform inversion
    Xing, Guangchi
    Zhu, Tieyuan
    GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 89 (05) : R429 - R442
  • [7] Frequency multiscale full-waveform velocity inversion
    Zhang Wen-Sheng
    Luo Jia
    Teng Ji-Wen
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2015, 58 (01): : 216 - 228
  • [8] Inversion strategies for Q estimation in viscoacoustic full-waveform inversion
    Yong, Peng
    Brossier, Romain
    Metivier, Ludovic
    GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 89 (05) : R399 - R413
  • [9] Time-domain elastic Gauss-Newton full-waveform inversion: a matrix-free approach
    Chen, Ke
    Sacchi, Mauricio D.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 223 (02) : 1007 - 1039
  • [10] Semiglobal viscoacoustic full-waveform inversion
    da Silva, Nuno V.
    Yao, Gang
    Warner, Michael
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (02) : R271 - R293