MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN METATARSAL BONES

被引:7
作者
Danesi, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Cristofolini, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Juszczyk, Mateusz Maria [1 ,2 ]
Erani, Paolo [1 ]
Viceconti, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Lab Tecnol Med, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Fac Ingn, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Metatarsal bones structural mechanical properties; bending and axial and torsional stiffness; destructive in vitro testing; 5TH METATARSAL; CORTICAL BONE; STRESS-FRACTURES; 2ND METATARSAL; BASE; 5TH-METATARSAL; STRENGTH; GEOMETRY; DENSITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1142/S0219519412005034
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Despite the incidence of metatarsal fractures and the associated risk of significant disability, little is known about the biomechanical properties (strength and stiffness) of metatarsal bones. In most cases a single metatarsal bone (first, second and fifth) has been investigated. An extensive investigation of the biomechanical properties of the metatarsal bones is essential in the understanding and prevention of metatarsal injuries. Entire sets of metatarsal bones from four feet were tested. The first foot was used to fine-tune the testing set-ups. To measure the stiffness, each metatarsal bone was subjected to non-destructive four-point-bending in the sagittal and transverse planes, axial compression and torsion. Strain was measured at two locations. To measure the strength, each metatarsal bone was tested to failure in torsion. Significant differences (p < 0: 0001) existed among the stiffness of the five metatarsal bones: (i) in torsion the first metatarsal bone was 2 - 3 times stiffer than the others; (ii) in four-point-bending and axial compression this difference was less pronounced than in torsion; (iii) differences were smaller among the other metatarsal bones; (iv) the second metatarsal bone was less stir than the third and fourth in bending. The second, third and fourth metatarsal bones were stir er in the sagittal than in the transverse plane (p < 0: 0001). Conversely, there was no significant difference between the two planes of bending for the first and fifth bones. During destructive testing, all metatarsal bones exhibited a linear elastic behavior and brittle failure. The torsional strength at failure ranged between 1.9 Nm and 6.9 Nm. The first metatarsal bone was stronger than all the others. Stiffness in different loading conditions and failure were measured and compared for all metatarsal bones. These data corroborate previous biomechanical studies concerning the role and load sharing of the different metatarsal bones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Metatarsal fractures and sports
    Shuen, W. M. V.
    Boulton, C.
    Batt, M. E.
    Moran, C.
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2009, 7 (02): : 86 - 88
  • [42] A study of metatarsal fractures in children
    Singer, Georg
    Cichocki, Martin
    Schalamon, Johannes
    Eberl, Robert
    Hoellwarth, Michael E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (04) : 772 - 776
  • [43] STOKES IAF, 1979, J ANAT, V129, P579
  • [44] FRACTURES OF THE BASE OF THE 5TH METATARSAL DISTAL TO THE TUBEROSITY - CLASSIFICATION AND GUIDELINES FOR NON-SURGICAL AND SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT
    TORG, JS
    BALDUINI, FC
    ZELKO, RR
    PAVLOV, H
    PEFF, TC
    DAS, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 66A (02) : 209 - 214
  • [45] Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal
    Vorlat, Peter
    Achtergael, Wim
    Haentjens, Patrick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 31 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [46] Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: A prospective study
    Wiener, BD
    Linder, JF
    Giattini, JFG
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 18 (05) : 267 - 269
  • [47] Functional treatment of acute metatarsal fractures: a prospective randomised comparison of management in a cast versus elasticated support bandage
    Zenios, M
    Kim, WY
    Sampath, J
    Muddu, BN
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 (07): : 832 - 835