Assessment of shoulder position variation and its impact on IMRT and VMAT doses for head and neck cancer

被引:28
|
作者
Neubauer, Emily [1 ]
Dong, Lei [1 ]
Followill, David S. [1 ]
Garden, Adam S. [2 ]
Court, Laurence E. [1 ]
White, R. Allen [3 ]
Kry, Stephen F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Bioinformat & Computat Biol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2012年 / 7卷
关键词
Head and Neck; shoulder shifts; IMRT; VMAT; setup; shoulder; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-7-19
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: For radiotherapy of the head and neck, 5-point mask immobilization is used to stabilize the shoulders. Still, the daily position of the shoulders during treatment may be different from the position in the treatment plan despite correct isocenter setup. The purpose of this study was to determine the interfractional displacement of the shoulders relative to isocenter over the course of treatment and the associated dosimetric effect of this displacement. Methods: The extent of shoulder displacements relative to isocenter was assessed for 10 patients in 5-point thermoplastic masks using image registration and daily CT-on-rails scans. Dosimetric effects on IMRT and VMAT plans were evaluated in Pinnacle based on simulation CTs modified to represent shoulder shifts between 3 and 15 mm in the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and right-left directions. The impact of clinically observed shoulder shifts on the low-neck dose distributions was examined. Results: Shoulder motion was 2-5 mm in each direction on average but reached 20 mm. Superior shifts resulted in coverage loss, whereas inferior shifts increased the dose to the brachial plexus. These findings were generally consistent for both IMRT and VMAT plans. Over a course of observed shifts, the dose to 99% of the CTV decreased by up to 101 cGy, and the brachial plexus dose increased by up to 72 cGy. Conclusions: he position of the shoulder affects target coverage and critical structure dose, and may therefore be a concern during the setup of head and neck patients, particularly those with low neck primary disease.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Density variation of parotid glands during IMRT for head-neck cancer: Correlation with treatment and anatomical parameters
    Fiorino, Claudio
    Rizzo, Giovanna
    Scalco, Elisa
    Broggi, Sara
    Belli, Maria Luisa
    Dell'Oca, Italo
    Dinapoli, Nicola
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Rodriguez, Aldo Mejia
    Di Muzio, Nadia
    Calandrino, Riccardo
    Sanguineti, Giuseppe
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Cattaneo, Giovanni Mauro
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 104 (02) : 224 - 229
  • [42] Improvement of VMAT plan quality for head and neck cancer with high resolution fluences generated by couch shift between arcs
    Park, Jong Min
    Park, So-Yeon
    Wu, Hong-Gyun
    Kim, Jung-in
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 46 : 1 - 6
  • [43] Exploratory study of the association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan robustness with local failure in head and neck cancer
    Liu, Wei
    Patel, Samir H.
    Harrington, Daniel P.
    Hu, Yanle
    Ding, Xiaoning
    Shen, Jiajian
    Halyard, Michele Y.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Wong, William W.
    Ezzell, Gary E.
    Bues, Martin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (04): : 76 - 83
  • [44] The dosimetric and radiobiological impact of calculation grid size on head and neck IMRT
    Srivastava, Shiv P.
    Cheng, Chee-Wai
    Das, Indra J.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7 (03) : 209 - 217
  • [45] Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with Oncentra MasterPlan® for the treatment of head and neck cancer
    Alvarez-Moret, Judith
    Pohl, Fabian
    Koelbl, Oliver
    Dobler, Barbara
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5
  • [46] AN EVALUATIONOF VOLUMETRICINTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY AND CONVENTIONAL IMRT IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER
    Jakubovskij, E.
    Rudgalvyte, M.
    Viciene, R. Stepona
    Grybauskas, M.
    Sendiuliene, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2015, : 26 - 30
  • [47] Impact of Node Negative Target Volume Delineation on Contralateral Parotid Gland Dose Sparing Using IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
    Magnuson, William J.
    Urban, Erich
    Bayliss, R. Adam
    Harari, Paul M.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2015, 14 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [48] Assessment of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for use in patients after neck dissection for head and neck cancer
    Goldstein, David P.
    Ringash, Jolie
    Irish, Jonathan C.
    Gilbert, Ralph
    Gullane, Patrick
    Brown, Dale
    Xu, Wei
    Del Bel, Ryan
    Chepeha, Douglas
    Davis, Aileen M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (02): : 234 - 242
  • [49] Evaluation of fully automated a priori MCO treatment planning in VMAT for head-and-neck cancer
    Biston, Marie-Claude
    Costea, Madalina
    Gassa, Frederic
    Serre, Anne-Agathe
    Voet, Peter
    Larson, Randy
    Gregoire, Vincent
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 : 31 - 38
  • [50] Neck and Shoulder Impairments and the Relationship to Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors
    Swisher, Anne K.
    Altaha, Ramin
    Arbaugh, Joshua
    Barr, Kaitlyn
    Brooks, David
    Copeland, Aaron
    Harvey, Sara
    Kolanko, Rachel
    Mohler, Sarah
    Polak, Catherine
    Simpson, Jamie
    Wade, Ashley
    REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 3 - 7