Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification in general medical patients at an academic medical center

被引:9
|
作者
Fritz, Megan Kunka [1 ]
Kincaid, Scott E. [1 ]
Sargent, Charles G. [2 ]
Green, Amanda H. [3 ]
Davis, George A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Pharm Dept, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Div Hosp Med, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Dept Nursing, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
Venous thromboembolism; Classification; Risk factors; Low molecular weight heparin; Heparin; PROPHYLAXIS; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; THROMBOSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11239-020-02144-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still a concern for general medical patients. Pharmacologic prophylaxis can reduce VTE incidence, but there is the potential for adverse effects. Therefore, determining which patients should receive VTE prophylaxis via risk scoring tools is essential. Limited evidence exists for the ideal venous thromboembolism risk assessment model (RAM) in hospitalized medical patients, as compared to other hospitalized patient subgroups such as surgical patients. The primary objective was to investigate the utilization and appropriateness of our institution-based VTE RAM and comparison to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS). This would allow for a gauge of provider risk assessment accuracy as well as appropriate predictive potential of the PPS or whether an alternative to the PPS should be considered. A total of 330 adult general medicine patients were included in this retrospective chart review. When compared to our institution-based VTE RAM, providers predominately stratified patients at a higher VTE risk than the institution-based VTE RAM. VTE incidence was 0.3%, which was lower than predicted. Significant discordance exists between providers' VTE risk assessment and that predicted by RAMs. Our institution-based VTE RAM appears comparable to PPS; however, it was not being utilized by providers, resulting in potentially unnecessary use of pharmacologic prophylaxis. The most appropriate venous thromboembolism risk assessment model for general medicine patients is undetermined. Our providers generally assess patients as moderate or high VTE risk, despite our institution-based RAM which typically recommends a lower risk category than provider selection. Because of provider risk assessment, more patients received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis than would have been recommended by the RAM, which might correlate to the low incidence of VTE which was < 0.5%, although bleeding complications were not assessed in this study. A prospective study utilizing the Padua Prediction Score (or similar RAM) in general medicine patients is warranted in order to decipher the best method of predicting VTE risk.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors for symptomatic venous thromboembolism in Thai hospitalised medical patients
    Rojnuckarin, Ponlapat
    Uaprasert, Noppacharn
    Vajragupta, Laddawan
    Numkarunarunrote, Numphung
    Tanpowpong, Nathaporn
    Sutcharitchan, Pranee
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2011, 106 (06) : 1103 - 1108
  • [42] Risk Factor Model to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    Lindenauer, Peter K.
    Lahti, Maureen
    Pekow, Penelope S.
    Selker, Harry P.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2011, 6 (04) : 202 - 209
  • [43] Quality Improvement at an Academic Cancer Center: Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
    Baz, Rachid
    Furman, Roy
    Simondsen, Katherine
    Stone, Christine
    CANCER CONTROL, 2020, 27 (02)
  • [44] Are we assessing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk appropriately for hospitalised medical patients? The National VTE Risk Assessment Tool versus Padua Prediction Score
    Chandra, Deepak
    Dabhi, Keval
    Lester, Will
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2020, 189 (01) : E16 - E18
  • [45] Association of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with clinically relevant bleeding and hospital-acquired anemia in medical inpatients: the risk stratification for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in medical patients study
    Choffat, Damien
    Rossel, Jean-Benoit
    Aujesky, Drahomir
    Vollenweider, Peter
    Baumgartner, Christine
    Mean, Marie
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2024, 22 (03) : 765 - 774
  • [46] A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score
    Barbar, S.
    Noventa, F.
    Rossetto, V.
    Ferrari, A.
    Brandolin, B.
    Perlati, M.
    De Bon, E.
    Tormene, D.
    Pagnan, A.
    Prandoni, P.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2010, 8 (11) : 2450 - 2457
  • [47] Predicting the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE)
    Michael B. Streiff
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2015, 39 : 353 - 366
  • [48] Risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after adrenalectomy for adrenal cortical neoplasms
    Moore, Maureen D.
    Agrusa, Christopher
    Ullmann, Timothy M.
    Beninato, Toni
    Zarnegar, Rasa
    Fahey, Thomas J., III
    Finnerty, Brendan M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 126 (07) : 1176 - 1182
  • [49] Stratification of Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Ovarian Cancer Patients During Chemotherapy
    Mereu, Liliana
    Tateo, Saverio
    Klersy, Catherine
    Gabellotti, Eva Martinotti
    Polatti, Franco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (01) : 79 - 83
  • [50] Adherence to Guideline-Directed Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Among Medical and Surgical Inpatients at 33 Academic Medical Centers in the United States
    Schleyer, Anneliese M.
    Schreuder, Astrid B.
    Jarman, Kenneth M.
    LoGerfo, James P.
    Goss, J. Richard
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2011, 26 (03) : 174 - 180