Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification in general medical patients at an academic medical center

被引:9
|
作者
Fritz, Megan Kunka [1 ]
Kincaid, Scott E. [1 ]
Sargent, Charles G. [2 ]
Green, Amanda H. [3 ]
Davis, George A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Pharm Dept, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Div Hosp Med, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Dept Nursing, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
Venous thromboembolism; Classification; Risk factors; Low molecular weight heparin; Heparin; PROPHYLAXIS; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; THROMBOSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11239-020-02144-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still a concern for general medical patients. Pharmacologic prophylaxis can reduce VTE incidence, but there is the potential for adverse effects. Therefore, determining which patients should receive VTE prophylaxis via risk scoring tools is essential. Limited evidence exists for the ideal venous thromboembolism risk assessment model (RAM) in hospitalized medical patients, as compared to other hospitalized patient subgroups such as surgical patients. The primary objective was to investigate the utilization and appropriateness of our institution-based VTE RAM and comparison to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS). This would allow for a gauge of provider risk assessment accuracy as well as appropriate predictive potential of the PPS or whether an alternative to the PPS should be considered. A total of 330 adult general medicine patients were included in this retrospective chart review. When compared to our institution-based VTE RAM, providers predominately stratified patients at a higher VTE risk than the institution-based VTE RAM. VTE incidence was 0.3%, which was lower than predicted. Significant discordance exists between providers' VTE risk assessment and that predicted by RAMs. Our institution-based VTE RAM appears comparable to PPS; however, it was not being utilized by providers, resulting in potentially unnecessary use of pharmacologic prophylaxis. The most appropriate venous thromboembolism risk assessment model for general medicine patients is undetermined. Our providers generally assess patients as moderate or high VTE risk, despite our institution-based RAM which typically recommends a lower risk category than provider selection. Because of provider risk assessment, more patients received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis than would have been recommended by the RAM, which might correlate to the low incidence of VTE which was < 0.5%, although bleeding complications were not assessed in this study. A prospective study utilizing the Padua Prediction Score (or similar RAM) in general medicine patients is warranted in order to decipher the best method of predicting VTE risk.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification in general medical patients at an academic medical center
    Megan Kunka Fritz
    Scott E. Kincaid
    Charles G. Sargent
    Amanda H. Green
    George A. Davis
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2021, 51 : 67 - 73
  • [2] Reassessment of venous thromboembolism and bleeding risk in medical patients receiving VTE prophylaxis
    Tung, Elaine C.
    Yu, Shi-Yuan
    Shah, Kieran
    Kinkade, Angus
    Tejani, Aaron M.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [3] SUGGESTED VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) RISK STRATIFICATION SHEET FOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIES
    Alamiri, Mariam Ahmed
    Albsoul-Younes, Abla Mahmoud
    Al-Ajlouni, J.
    Sulaiman, Syed Azhar Bin Syed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, 2019, 10 (04): : 1660 - 1669
  • [4] Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in General Medical Patients
    Pattar, Rumi
    Kanji, Zahra
    Collins, Mark
    Boldt, Michael
    Mainra, Rajesh
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2005, 58 (05) : 285 - 290
  • [5] Risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients
    Spyropoulos, Alex C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2010, 16 (05) : 419 - 425
  • [6] A new risk assessment model for the stratification of the thromboembolism risk in medical patients: the TEVere Score
    Vincentelli, Giovanni M.
    Timpone, Sergio
    Murdolo, Giuseppe
    Fusco Moffa, Igino
    L'angiocola, Paolo D.
    Borgognoni, Francesco
    Monti, Manuel
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2018, 109 (06) : 436 - 442
  • [7] Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients
    Kessler, Craig M.
    Cap, Andrew P.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2009, 27 : 17 - 27
  • [8] Risk Assessment Models for Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients
    Hafliger, Emmanuel
    Kopp, Basil
    Farhoumand, Pauline Darbellay
    Choffat, Damien
    Rossel, Jean-Benoit
    Reny, Jean-Luc
    Aujesky, Drahomir
    Mean, Marie
    Baumgartner, Christine
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E249980
  • [9] Assessing the Caprini Score for Risk Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients
    Grant, Paul J.
    Greene, M. Todd
    Chopra, Vineet
    Bernstein, Steven J.
    Hofer, Timothy P.
    Flanders, Scott A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 129 (05) : 528 - 535
  • [10] Venous thromboembolism in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients
    Barba, Raquel
    Zapatero, Antonio
    Losa, Juan E.
    Marco, Javier
    Plaza, Susana
    Canora, Jesus
    Manuel Casas, Jose
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2010, 126 (04) : 276 - 279