DEVELOPMENT OF METACOGNITION AWARENESS SCALE FOR 10TH-12TH GRADE

被引:0
作者
Vanags, Edmunds [1 ]
Pestovs, Pavels [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Latvia, Riga, Latvia
来源
INNOVATIONS, TECHNOLOGIES AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 2019 | 2019年
关键词
metacognitive awareness inventory; cognition regulation; exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis; SCIENCE-EDUCATION;
D O I
10.22364/atee.2019.itre.15
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
One of the goals of the Latvian National Development Plan is to reduce the proportion of students with low cognitive skills, and at the same time increase the proportion of students with high level cognitive skills by the year 2020. In line with this goal, National Centre for Education has initiated a curriculum and educational assessment system reform. It is important to create assessment instruments for both: subject specific content and 21st century skills, which are integrated in the learning outcomes in the revised curriculum. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot a new metacognitive awareness scale for 10-12 grade pupils. The instrument was based on the structure of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Schraw, & Sperling, 1994), creating new items and making them specific to the content of national level large-scale assessment in Science. A total of 1,257 pupils (48.4% boys, 51.6% girls) aged M = 15.30 (SD = 0.53) participated in the study. To find out the pupils' metacognitive awareness factors, 35 statements about different metacognitive activities were developed. Factor analysis showed good structure of 3 factors planning, monitoring, and evaluation, but weak structure of other possible factors. Internal consistency of the overall scale was good (a = 0.92). Discrimination and difficulty index levels meet accepted psychometric criteria. After multiple iterations, confirmatory factorial analysis revealed that 9-item model had good fit and good structure of three components: planning, monitoring, and evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 240
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, REGULATIONS REGARDIN, P747
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, METACOGNITION MOTIVA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, METACOGNITION MOTIVA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PISA 2015 RESULTS EX, V1
[5]   This Job is "Getting Old": Measuring Changes in Job Opportunities using Occupational Age Structure [J].
Autor, David ;
Dorn, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :45-51
[6]  
Barrett K.C., 2005, SPSS INTERMEDIATE ST
[7]   Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level [J].
Dignath, Charlotte ;
Buettner, Gerhard .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2008, 3 (03) :231-264
[8]   META-COGNITION AND COGNITIVE MONITORING - NEW AREA OF COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENTAL INQUIRY [J].
FLAVELL, JH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1979, 34 (10) :906-911
[9]   Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence [J].
Harrison, George M. ;
Vallin, Lisa M. .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2018, 13 (01) :15-38
[10]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55