Multi-Objective Optimization Model EPLANopt for Energy Transition Analysis and Comparison with Climate-Change Scenarios

被引:25
|
作者
Prina, Matteo Giacomo [1 ]
Manzolini, Giampaolo [2 ]
Moser, David [1 ]
Vaccaro, Roberto [1 ]
Sparber, Wolfram [1 ]
机构
[1] EURAC Res, Inst Renewable Energy, Viale Druso 1, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20156 Milan, MI, Italy
关键词
energy scenarios; photovoltaics; wind; EPLANopt; multi-objective optimization; climate-change; 100-PERCENT RENEWABLE ENERGY; HIGH PENETRATION; SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY; IMPACT; FUTURE; ALGORITHMS; GENERATION; SOFTWARE; ISLANDS;
D O I
10.3390/en13123255
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The modeling of energy systems with high penetration of renewables is becoming more relevant due to environmental and security issues. Researchers need to support policy makers in the development of energy policies through results from simulating tools able to guide them. The EPLANopt model couples a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to EnergyPLAN simulation software to study the future best energy mix. In this study, EPLANopt is applied at country level to the Italian case study to assess the best configurations of the energy system in 2030. A scenario, the result of the optimization, is selected and compared to the Italian integrated energy and climate action plan scenario. It allows a further reduction of CO(2)emissions equal to 10% at the same annual costs of the Italian integrated energy and climate action plan scenario. Both these results are then compared to climate change scenarios through the carbon budget indicator. This comparison shows the difficulties to meet the Paris Agreement target of limiting the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees C. The results also show that this target can only be met through an increase in the total annual costs in the order of 25% with respect to the integrated energy and climate action plan scenario. However, the study also shows how the shift in expenditure from fossil fuels, external expenses, to investment on the national territory represents an opportunity to enhance the national economy.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-objective optimization model for sustainable Indonesian electricity system: Analysis of economic, environment, and adequacy of energy sources
    Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu
    Pratama, Yoga Wienda
    Nugroho, Yulianto Sulistyo
    Warjito
    Hertono, Gatot Fatwanto
    Hartono, Djoni
    Deendarlianto
    Tezuka, Tetsuo
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 81 : 308 - 318
  • [32] Climate policy scenarios in Brazil: A multi-model comparison for energy
    Lucena, Andre F. P.
    Clarke, Leon
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    Szklo, Alexandre
    Rochedo, Pedro R. R.
    Nogueira, Larissa P. P.
    Daenzer, Kathryn
    Gurgel, Angelo
    Kitous, Alban
    Kober, Tom
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 56 : 564 - 574
  • [33] Multi-Objective Operating Rules for Danjiangkou Reservoir Under Climate Change
    Guang Yang
    Shenglian Guo
    Liping Li
    Xingjun Hong
    Le Wang
    Water Resources Management, 2016, 30 : 1183 - 1202
  • [34] A multi-objective optimization model for the coordinated operation of hydropower and renewable energy
    Liu, Benxi
    Peng, Zihan
    Liao, Shengli
    Liu, Tengyuan
    Lu, Jia
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 11
  • [35] Numerical model and multi-objective optimization analysis of vehicle vibration
    Guo, Peng
    Zhang, Jun-hong
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2017, 18 (05): : 393 - 412
  • [36] Multi-Objective Energy Optimization with Load and Distributed Energy Source Scheduling in the Smart Power Grid
    Alzahrani, Ahmad
    Hafeez, Ghulam
    Ali, Sajjad
    Murawwat, Sadia
    Khan, Muhammad Iftikhar
    Rehman, Khalid
    Abed, Azher M.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [37] Development of an exergoeconomic model for analysis and multi-objective optimization of a thermoelectric heat pump
    Nemati, Arash
    Nami, Hossein
    Yari, Mortaza
    Ranjbar, Faramarz
    Kolvir, Hojjatollah Rashid
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 130 : 1 - 13
  • [38] A multi-objective optimization approach for selection of energy storage systems
    Li, Lanyu
    Liu, Pei
    Li, Zheng
    Wang, Xiaonan
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 115 : 213 - 225
  • [39] Methods for multi-objective optimization: An analysis
    Giagkiozis, I.
    Fleming, P. J.
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 293 : 338 - 350
  • [40] Performance Analysis and Comparison of Four Conventional Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms
    Fu, Maoyang
    Ding, Xudong
    Jia, Biaokun
    Liu, Zhongchen
    Zhao, Xingkai
    Sun, Mei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE 16TH CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2021), 2021, : 1513 - 1519