Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire

被引:24
|
作者
Rossi, A
Rucci, P
Mauri, M
Maina, G
Pieraccini, F
Pallanti, S
Endicott, J
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Dipartimento Med Sperimentale, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Psichiat Neurobiol Farmacol & Biotec, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Neurosci, I-10124 Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Siena, Dipartimento Neurosci, Sez Psichiat, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[5] Univ Florence, Dipartimento Sci Neurol & Psichiat, I-50121 Florence, Italy
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
anxiety; enjoyment; Quality of Life; reliability; satisfaction;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-005-7387-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is increasingly used in psychiatry because it gives emphasis to the subjective perspective of patients on physical, psychological and social domains. This paper reports on the validation of the Italian version of the Q-LES-Q in a large multicenter study (EQUIP) conducted at five Italian sites on outpatients in treatment for anxiety disorders. Study participants underwent a broad assessment of psychopathology including the MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Cronbach's alpha was used to determine the internal consistency of the Q-LES-Q areas and Pearson's r was used to analyze the correlation between the areas of Q-LES-Q and those of the other instruments. The internal consistency of the Q-LES-Q proved to be substantial (> 0.80 in each of the areas) as well as the test-retest reliability. The convergent validity of the Q-LES-Q vs. the Work and Social Adjustment Scale was examined. High correlations were found between scales measuring similar constructs in the two instruments and lower correlation between scales measuring different constructs. In conclusion, the Italian version of the Q-LES-Q proved to be as valid and reliable as the original English version.
引用
收藏
页码:2323 / 2328
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version
    Nikjooy, Afsaneh
    Jafari, Hassan
    Saba, Maryam A.
    Ebrahimi, Naghmeh
    Mirzaei, Rezvan
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 43 (03) : 261 - 268
  • [42] The Reliability and Validity of the Malay Version of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Mei, Lim Leek
    Abu, Muhammad Azrai
    Chew, Kah Teik
    Ismail, Aniza
    Zainuddin, Ani Amelia
    Nur Azurah, Abdul Ghani
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [43] Reliability and validity of the Persian version of patient assessment of constipation quality of life (PAC-QOL) questionnaire
    Mokhtare, M.
    Agah, S.
    Soltani-Kermanshahi, M.
    Ghafoori, S. M. S.
    Sheikhvatan, M.
    Boghratian, A. H.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 151 - 151
  • [44] Validity and reliability of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ version 2.1)
    Martin, BC
    Pathak, DS
    Sharfman, MI
    Adelman, JU
    Taylor, F
    Kwong, WJ
    Jhingran, P
    HEADACHE, 2000, 40 (03): : 204 - 215
  • [45] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO)
    Koçyigit, H
    Gülseren, S
    Erol, A
    Hizli, N
    Memis, A
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 22 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [46] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO)
    H. Koçyigit
    Ş. Gülseren
    A. Erol
    N. Hizli
    A. Memis
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2003, 22 : 18 - 23
  • [47] Reliability and Validity of the Lithuanian Version of CASP-19: A Quality of Life Questionnaire for the Elderly
    Cernovas, Andrejus
    Alekna, Vidmantas
    Tamulaitiene, Marija
    Stukas, Rimantas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2018, 54 (06):
  • [48] Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence
    Rogowski, Artur
    Bienkowski, Przemyslaw
    Samochowiec, Jerzy
    Mierzejewski, Pawel
    Jerzak, Malgorzata
    Baranowski, Wlodzimierz
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (06) : 731 - 736
  • [49] TURKISH VERSION QUALITY OF LIFE IN ESSENTIAL TREMOR QUESTIONNAIRE (QUEST): VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY
    Guler, Sibel
    Turan, F. Nesrin
    IDEGGYOGYASZATI SZEMLE-CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 68 (9-10): : 310 - 317
  • [50] Construct reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Adult ADHD Quality of Life Questionnaire (AAQoL)
    Mattos, Paulo
    Segenreich, Daniel
    Dias, Gabriela Macedo
    Nazar, Bruno
    Saboya, Eloisa
    Broad, Meryl
    REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA CLINICA, 2011, 38 (03): : 91 - 96