Prophylactic Compared With Therapeutic Ibuprofen Analgesia in First-Trimester Medical Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:34
作者
Raymond, Elizabeth G. [1 ]
Weaver, Mark A.
Louie, Karmen S.
Dean, Gillian
Porsch, Lauren
Lichtenberg, E. Steve
Ali, Rose
Arnesen, Michelle
机构
[1] Gynu Hlth Projects, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
DOUBLE-BLIND; PAIN RELIEF; ACETAMINOPHEN; MIFEPRISTONE; MISOPROSTOL; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829d5a33
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two oral analgesic regimens in first-trimester medical abortion. METHODS: We randomly assigned 250 participants undergoing first-trimester abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol at three clinics to two ibuprofen regimens: therapeutic (800 mg every 4-6 hours as needed for pain) or prophylactic (800 mg starting 1 hour before the misoprostol dose, then every 4-6 hours for 48 hours regardless of pain, then as needed). We asked each participant to record her maximum pain on a scale of 0-10 daily thereafter. RESULTS: Of participants assigned to the prophylactic and therapeutic regimens, 111 of 123 (90%) and 117 of 127 (92%), respectively, provided follow-up data. More than 80% of the participants in each group complied with their assigned treatment. Participants in the prophylactic group used substantially more ibuprofen than those in the therapeutic group (median of nine and four tablets, respectively). The mean maximum pain score was 7.1 in the prophylactic group and 7.3 in the therapeutic group (standard deviations 2.5 and 2.2, respectively); the difference was not statistically significant (P=.87, adjusted for site). Duration of pain, verbal pain ratings reported at follow-up, and use of other analgesics did not differ significantly by group (all P >.05). No significant benefit of the prophylactic regimen was apparent in any population subgroup. Abortion failure and ibuprofen side effects in the two groups were similar. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that prophylactic administration of ibuprofen reduces pain severity or duration in first-trimester medical abortion. The average pain severity experienced by participants using both regimens was high.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 564
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion
    Tang, Oi Shan
    Ho, Pak Chung
    CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 74 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [22] Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol (400 μg) for cervical priming in first-trimester abortion:: a randomized trial
    Carbonell Esteve, Josep Lluis
    Mari, Jose Maria
    Valero, Francisco
    Llorente, Margardel
    Salvador, Immaculada
    Varela, Lidia
    Leal, Pedro
    Candel, Ana
    Tudela, Ana
    Serrano, Maria
    Munoz, Eva
    CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 74 (04) : 328 - 333
  • [23] Clinical and psychological impact after surgical, medical or expectant management of first-trimester miscarriage - a randomised controlled trial
    Kong, Grace Wing Shan
    Lok, Ingrid Hung
    Yiu, Alice Ka Wah
    Hui, Annie Shuk Yi
    Lai, Beatrice Pui Yee
    Chung, Tony Kwok Hung
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 53 (02) : 170 - 177
  • [24] Letrozole vs. Placebo Pretreatment in the Medical Management of First Trimester Missed Miscarriage: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Torky, Haitham A.
    Marie, Heba
    ElDesouky, ElSayed
    Gebreel, Samy
    Raslan, Osama
    Moussa, Asem A.
    Ahmad, Ali M.
    Zain, Eman
    Mohsen, Mohamed N.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2018, 78 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [25] Combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol for First-Trimester Medical Abortion: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
    Kelesidou, Vera
    Tsakiridis, Ioannis
    Virgiliou, Andriana
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    Mamopoulos, Apostolos
    Athanasiadis, Apostolos
    Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2024, 79 (01) : 54 - 63
  • [26] A randomized controlled comparison of sublingual and vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion
    Hamoda, H
    Ashok, PW
    Flett, GMM
    Templeton, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (01) : 55 - 59
  • [27] A randomized controlled trial of different buccal misoprostol doses in mifepristone medical abortion
    Chong, Erica
    Tsereteli, Tamar
    Nhu Ngoc Thi Nguyen
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [28] Nitrous oxide versus oral sedation for pain management of first-trimester surgical abortion - a randomized study
    Singh, Rameet H.
    Montoya, Maria
    Espey, Eve
    Leeman, Lawrence
    CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 96 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [29] Effectiveness of celecoxib for pain relief and antipyresis in second trimester medical abortions with misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial
    Tintara, Hatern
    Voradithi, Peangpailin
    Choobun, Thanapan
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 297 (03) : 709 - 715
  • [30] Sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol for completion of first trimester missed abortion: a randomised controlled trial
    Abdelshafy, Ahmed
    Awwad, Hassan
    Abo-Gamra, Amgad
    Alanwar, Ahmed
    Elkotb, Ahmed M.
    Shahin, Mohamed
    Abd El-Razek, Maya
    Abbas, Ahmed M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2019, 24 (02) : 134 - 139