Arctic Sea Ice in Two Configurations of the CESM2 During the 20th and 21st Centuries

被引:47
作者
DeRepentigny, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Jahn, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Holland, Marika M. [3 ]
Smith, Abigail [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Inst Arctic & Alpine Res, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Arctic sea ice; Climate projections; Ice-free Arctic; Modeling; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; INTERNAL VARIABILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; OCEAN; AEROSOLS; IMPACTS; RECORD; COVER;
D O I
10.1029/2020JC016133
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
We provide an assessment of the current and future states of Arctic sea ice simulated by the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). The CESM2 is the version of the CESM contributed to the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). We analyze changes in Arctic sea ice cover in two CESM2 configurations with differing atmospheric components: the CESM2(CAM6) and the CESM2(WACCM6). Over the historical period, the CESM2(CAM6) winter ice thickness distribution is biased thin, which leads to lower summer ice area compared to CESM2(WACCM6) and observations. In both CESM2 configurations, the timing of first ice-free conditions is insensitive to the choice of CMIP6 future emissions scenario. In fact, the probability of an ice-free Arctic summer remains low only if global warming stays below 1.5 degrees C, which none of the CMIP6 scenarios achieve. By the end of the 21st century, the CESM2 simulates less ocean heat loss during the fall months compared to its previous version, delaying sea ice formation and leading to ice-free conditions for up to 8 months under the high emissions scenario. As a result, both CESM2 configurations exhibit an accelerated decline in winter and spring ice area, a behavior that had not been previously seen in CESM simulations. Differences in climate sensitivity and higher levels of atmospheric CO(2)by 2100 in the CMIP6 high emissions scenario compared to its CMIP5 analog could explain why this winter ice loss was not previously simulated by the CESM.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [41] Inter-annual to multi-decadal Arctic sea ice extent trends in a warming world
    Kay, Jennifer E.
    Holland, Marika M.
    Jahn, Alexandra
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
  • [42] Attribution of Extreme Events in Arctic Sea Ice Extent
    Kirchmeier-Young, Megan C.
    Zwiers, Francis W.
    Gillett, Nathan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (02) : 553 - 571
  • [43] Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: losses and coupled variability (1958-2018)
    Kwok, R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [44] Labe Z, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P3233, DOI [10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0436.1, 10.1175/jcli-d-17-0436.1]
  • [45] The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty
    Lawrence, David M.
    Fisher, Rosie A.
    Koven, Charles D.
    Oleson, Keith W.
    Swenson, Sean C.
    Bonan, Gordon
    Collier, Nathan
    Ghimire, Bardan
    van Kampenhout, Leo
    Kennedy, Daniel
    Kluzek, Erik
    Lawrence, Peter J.
    Li, Fang
    Li, Hongyi
    Lombardozzi, Danica
    Riley, William J.
    Sacks, William J.
    Shi, Mingjie
    Vertenstein, Mariana
    Wieder, William R.
    Xu, Chonggang
    Ali, Ashehad A.
    Badger, Andrew M.
    Bisht, Gautam
    van den Broeke, Michiel
    Brunke, Michael A.
    Burns, Sean P.
    Buzan, Jonathan
    Clark, Martyn
    Craig, Anthony
    Dahlin, Kyla
    Drewniak, Beth
    Fisher, Joshua B.
    Flanner, Mark
    Fox, Andrew M.
    Gentine, Pierre
    Hoffman, Forrest
    Keppel-Aleks, Gretchen
    Knox, Ryan
    Kumar, Sanjiv
    Lenaerts, Jan
    Leung, L. Ruby
    Lipscomb, William H.
    Lu, Yaqiong
    Pandey, Ashutosh
    Pelletier, Jon D.
    Perket, Justin
    Randerson, James T.
    Ricciuto, Daniel M.
    Sanderson, Benjamin M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 11 (12) : 4245 - 4287
  • [46] Arctic sea-ice change tied to its mean state through thermodynamic processes
    Massonnet, Francois
    Vancoppenolle, Martin
    Goosse, Hugues
    Docquier, David
    Fichefet, Thierry
    Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, Edward
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (07) : 599 - +
  • [47] Arctic Clouds and Precipitation in the Community Earth System Model Version 2
    McIlhattan, Elin A.
    Kay, Jennifer E.
    L'Ecuyer, Tristan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2020, 125 (22)
  • [48] Characteristics of Future Warmer Base States in CESM2
    Meehl, Gerald A.
    Arblaster, Julie M.
    Bates, Susan
    Richter, Jadwiga H.
    Tebaldi, Claudia
    Gettelman, Andrew
    Medeiros, Brian
    Bacmeister, Julio
    DeRepentigny, Patricia
    Rosenbloom, Nan
    Shields, Christine
    Hu, Aixue
    Teng, Haiyan
    Mills, Michael J.
    Strand, Gary
    [J]. EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2020, 7 (09)
  • [49] Meier W.N., 2017, NOAANSIDC CLIMATE DA, DOI DOI 10.7265/N59P2ZTG
  • [50] Arctic marine mammals and climate change: Impacts and resilience
    Moore, Sue E.
    Huntington, Henry P.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 18 (02) : S157 - S165