Crowdsourcing in Software Development: Empirical Support for Configuring Contests

被引:5
作者
Bibi, Stamatia [1 ]
Zozas, Ioannis [1 ]
Ampatzoglou, Apostolos [2 ]
Sarigiannidis, Panagiotis G. [1 ]
Kalampokis, George [1 ]
Stamelos, Ioannis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Macedonia, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Kozani 50100, Greece
[2] Univ Macedonia, Dept Appl Informat, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Informat, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2020年 / 8卷 / 08期
关键词
Crowdsourcing; software development; success factors; crowd factors; cost; duration;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982619
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Despite the extensive adoption of crowdsourcing for the timely, cost-effective, and high-quality completion of software development tasks, a large number of crowdsourced challenges are not able to acquire a winning solution, on time, and within the desired cost and quality thresholds. A possible reason for this is that we currently lack a systematic approach that would aid software managers during the process of designing software development tasks that will be crowdsourced. This paper attempts to extend the current knowledge on designing crowdsourced software development tasks, by empirically answering the following management questions: (a) what type of projects should be crowdsourced; (b) why should one crowdsource-in terms of acquired benefits; (c) where should one crowdsource-in terms of application domain; (d) when to crowdsource-referring to the time period of the year; (e) who will win or participate in the contest; and (f) how to crowdsource (define contest duration, prize, type of contest etc.) to acquire the maximum benefits-depending on the goal of crowdsourcing. To answer the aforementioned questions, we have performed a case study on 2,209 software development tasks crowdsourced through TopCoder platform. The results suggest that there are significant differences in the level to which crowdsourcing goals are reached, across different software development activities. Based on this observation we suggest that software managers should prioritize the goals of crowdsourcing, decide carefully upon the activity to be crowdsourced and then define the settings of the task.
引用
收藏
页码:58094 / 58117
页数:24
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Factors That Influence the Quality of Crowdsourcing
    Al Sohibani, May
    Al Osaimi, Najd
    Al Ehaidib, Reem
    Al Muhanna, Sarah
    Dahanayake, Ajantha
    [J]. NEW TRENDS IN DATABASE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS II, 2015, 312 : 287 - 300
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, Technical Communication
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, P 2 INT WORKSH SOFTW
  • [4] Archak Nikolay, 2010, P 19 INT C WORLD WID, P21
  • [5] Basili Victor, 1992, CSTR2956 U MAR COLL
  • [6] Bonabeau E, 2009, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V50, P45
  • [7] Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention
    Dahlander, Linus
    Piezunka, Henning
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (05) : 812 - 827
  • [8] Task Division for Team Success in Crowdsourcing Contests: Resource Allocation and Alignment Effects
    Dissanayake, Indika
    Zhang, Jie
    Gu, Bin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 32 (02) : 8 - 39
  • [9] Crowdsourcing Systems on the World-Wide Web
    Doan, Anhai
    Ramakrishnan, Raghu
    Halevy, Alon Y.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2011, 54 (04) : 86 - 96
  • [10] Trustworthiness in Enterprise Crowdsourcing: a Taxonomy & evidence from data
    Dwarakanath, Anurag
    Shrikanth, N. C.
    Abhinav, Kumar
    Kass, Alex
    [J]. 2016 IEEE/ACM 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COMPANION (ICSE-C), 2016, : 41 - 50