The RC scales predict psychotherapy outcomes: The predictive validity of the MMPI-2's restructured clinical scales for psychotherapeutic outcomes

被引:5
作者
Scholte, Wubbo [1 ]
Tiemens, Bea [2 ]
Verheul, Roel [3 ]
Meerman, Anke [4 ]
Egger, Jos [5 ]
Hutschemaekers, Giel [2 ]
机构
[1] Pro Persona, NL-6716 RR Ede, Netherlands
[2] Pro Persona Proces, Renkum, Netherlands
[3] De Viersprong, Halsteren, Netherlands
[4] Pro Persona, Ctr Psychotherapy, Lunteren, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Neuropsychiatry Excellence, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
PERSONALITY-DISORDER; DIAGNOSIS; NICHOLS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1002/pmh.1190
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
This study investigated the capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory's (MMPI-2) restructured clinical (RC) scales to predict treatment outcomes of inpatient psychotherapy concerning long-term changes in the level of psychopathology for patients with personality disorders. The predictive capacity of the RC scales is compared with that of the clinical scales. The MMPI-2 was administered at baseline. We followed up 179 patients for 36 months. The Brief Symptom Inventory measured the symptom changes between baseline and the end of the treatment as well as between baseline and 36 months. The RC2 (Low Positive Emotions) scale and RC8 (Aberrant Experiences) scale predicted lower levels of symptomatic improvements at 36 months. These scales did not have a significantly better performance than the original clinical scales. The RC2 and the 2(Depression) scale of the clinical scales predicted less improvement at 36 months. These findings emphasize that the RC scales should not be used alone or as a replacement for the clinical scales. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 302
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Arrindell RA, 1986, SCL 90 HANDLEIDING B
[2]   Effectiveness of Different Modalities of Psychotherapeutic Treatment for Patients with Cluster C Personality Disorders: Results of a Large Prospective Multicentre Study [J].
Bartak, Anna ;
Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D. ;
Andrea, Helene ;
Holleman, Lot ;
Rijnierse, Piet ;
Rossum, Bert V. ;
Hamers, Elisabeth F. M. ;
Meerman, Anke M. M. A. ;
Aerts, Janneke ;
Busschbach, Jan J. V. ;
Verheul, Roel ;
Stijnen, Theo ;
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2010, 79 (01) :20-30
[3]   Behavioral Correlates of Selected MMPI-2 Clinical, Content, and Restructured Clinical Scales [J].
Binford, Allison ;
Liljequist, Laura .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2008, 90 (06) :608-614
[4]  
Butcher J.N., 1989, MINNESOTA MULTIPHASI
[5]   Methodological problems and issues in MMPI, MMPI-2, and MMPI-A research [J].
Butcher, JN ;
Graham, JR ;
BenPorath, YS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :320-329
[6]   Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology [J].
Camara, WJ ;
Nathan, JS ;
Puente, AE .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2000, 31 (02) :141-154
[7]   Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization [J].
Clark, Lee Anna .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 58 :227-257
[8]  
Clarkin J.F., 2004, HDB PSYCHOTHERAPY BE, V5th
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[10]  
de Beurs E., 2006, Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, V61, P120