SFL praxis in the US teacher education: a critical literature review

被引:34
作者
Accurso, Kathryn [1 ]
Gebhard, Meg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Language & Literacy Educ, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Teacher Educ & Curriculum Studies, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
Systemic functional linguistics; teacher professional development; critical language awareness; disciplinary literacies; pedagogical knowledge; RACIOLINGUISTIC IDEOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1080/09500782.2020.1781880
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This literature review analyzes the influences of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) in the U.S. teacher education from 2000 to 2019. First, we describe how SFL has been contextualized in the United States in response to changing demographics, new technologies, policies, and the impacts of globalization. Second, we outline our methodology, which yielded 136 publications from the fields of literacy research, teacher education, and applied linguistics. Third, we present four findings: (1) the main vehicles for introducing the U.S. teachers to SFL theory and practice are grant-funded university-school partnerships, courses in colleges of education, and self-contained professional development workshops; (2) most interventions focused on introducing teachers to functional metalanguage and text analysis, with fewer focusing on multimodality; (3) SFL interventions positively influenced teachers' level of semiotic awareness and ability to design focused disciplinary literacy instruction. Teachers' critical awareness and confidence for literacy instruction were influenced to a lesser extent; and (4) more sustained investments in teacher professional development led to greater gains in teacher learning as well as a critical awareness of the relationship between disciplinary literacy practices and ideologies at work in K-12 schools. Based on these findings, we conclude with three recommendations for the future of critical SFL praxis in teacher education.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 428
页数:27
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Accurso K., 2019, THESIS
[2]  
Aguirre-Munoz Z., 2014, EFFECTIVE ED PROGRAM, P63
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LANGUAGE SCH FUNCTIO, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410610317
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Linguistics and Education, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7, 10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7]
[6]  
Byrnes H., 2012, L2 writing development multiple perspectives, P190
[7]   A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures [J].
Cazden, C ;
Cope, B ;
Fairclough, N ;
Gee, J ;
Kalantzis, M ;
Kress, G ;
Luke, A ;
Luke, C ;
Michaels, S ;
Nakata, M .
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1996, 66 (01) :60-92
[8]  
Clark Romy., 1990, Lang Educ, V4, P249, DOI DOI 10.1080/09500789009541291
[9]  
Colombi M.C., 2009, Linguistics and Education, V20, P39, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.LINGED.2009.01.004
[10]  
Cooper H., 2015, Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach