Competition and monopoly in the U.S. economy: What do the industrial concentration data show?

被引:18
作者
Davis, Leila [1 ]
Orhangazi, Ozgur [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Kadir Has Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Industrial concentration; market concentration; monopolization; competition; capital accumulation; profitability; INVESTMENT; FALL;
D O I
10.1177/1024529420934011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A recent series of academic studies, think-tank reports, and news articles shows widespread attention to rising industrial concentration and market power in the U.S. economy. In this paper, we focus on concentration in the U.S. nonfinancial corporate sector to make three contributions to the literature. First, we use examples from the debate on industrial concentration to show that there are often-divergent predictions in the theoretical literature surrounding the expected consequences of concentration and monopolization for nonfinancial firms. Second, we use industry-level concentration data to describe recent trends in average concentration. We show that, while concentration increases across the majority of industries after the late 1990s, the retail and information-services sectors are particularly key for understanding recent trends in average industrial concentration. Third, we link our industry-level analysis with firm-level data to describe the relationship between industrial concentration and nonfinancial corporations' profitability, markups, and investment. Consistent with the ambiguities in the theoretical literature, we find that these relationships are not uniform: while some highly concentrated industries confirm standard expectations with high markups, high profitability, and low investment rates, other highly concentrated industries earn lower-than-average markups and profits, suggesting that - in some industries - increased concentration and intensified competition may go hand in hand.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 30
页数:28
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The Limitations of Industry Concentration Measures Constructed with Compustat Data: Implications for Finance Research [J].
Ali, Ashiq ;
Klasa, Sandy ;
Yeung, Eric .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (10) :3839-3871
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Capitalism
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1966, MONOPOLY CAPITAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GUARDIAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BEN COMP IND MARK PO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1971, SELECTED ESSAYS DYNA
[7]   THE FALL OF THE LABOR SHARE AND THE RISE OF SUPERSTAR FIRMS [J].
Autor, David ;
Dorn, David ;
Katz, Lawrence F. ;
Patterson, Christina ;
Van Reenen, John .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 135 (02) :645-709
[8]   Concentrating on the Fall of the Labor Share [J].
Autor, David ;
Dorn, David ;
Katz, Lawrence F. ;
Patterson, Christina ;
Van Reenen, John .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (05) :180-185
[9]  
Barkai S., 2016, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State New Working Paper Series, V2
[10]  
Bork R, 1979, ANTITRUST PARADOX PO