Predicting crop yields and soil-plant nitrogen dynamics in the US Corn Belt

被引:104
作者
Archontoulis, Sotirios, V [1 ]
Castellano, Michael J. [1 ]
Licht, Mark A. [1 ]
Nichols, Virginia [1 ]
Baum, Mitch [1 ]
Huber, Isaiah [1 ]
Martinez-Feria, Rafael [1 ,2 ]
Puntel, Laila [1 ,3 ]
Ordonez, Raziel A. [1 ]
Iqbal, Javed [1 ,3 ]
Wright, Emily E. [1 ]
Dietzel, Ranae N. [1 ]
Helmers, Matt [4 ]
Vanloocke, Andy [1 ]
Liebman, Matt [1 ]
Hatfield, Jerry L. [5 ]
Herzmann, Daryl [1 ]
Cordova, S. Carolina [1 ,6 ]
Edmonds, Patrick [1 ]
Togliatti, Kaitlin [1 ]
Kessler, Ashlyn [1 ]
Danalatos, Gerasimos [1 ]
Pasley, Heather [1 ]
Pederson, Carl [4 ]
Lamkey, Kendall R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Agron Hall, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, Elings Hall, Ames, IA USA
[5] USDA ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA USA
[6] Michigan State Univ, Kellogg Biol Stn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
WATER TABLES; MAIZE; MODEL; SYSTEMS; APSIM; SIMULATION; WHEAT; IOWA; IMPACTS; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1002/csc2.20039
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
We used the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) to predict and explain maize and soybean yields, phenology, and soil water and nitrogen (N) dynamics during the growing season in Iowa, USA. Historical, current and forecasted weather data were used to drive simulations, which were released in public four weeks after planting. In this paper, we (1) describe the methodology used to perform forecasts; (2) evaluate model prediction accuracy against data collected from 10 locations over four years; and (3) identify inputs that are key in forecasting yields and soil N dynamics. We found that the predicted median yield at planting was a very good indicator of end-of-season yields (relative root mean square error [RRMSE] of similar to 20%). For reference, the prediction at maturity, when all the weather was known, had a RRMSE of 14%. The good prediction at planting time was explained by the existence of shallow water tables, which decreased model sensitivity to unknown summer precipitation by 50-64%. Model initial conditions and management information accounted for one-fourth of the variation in maize yield. End of season model evaluations indicated that the model simulated well crop phenology (R-2 = 0.88), root depth (R-2 = 0.83), biomass production (R-2 = 0.93), grain yield (R-2 = 0.90), plant N uptake (R-2 = 0.87), soil moisture (R-2 = 0.42), soil temperature (R-2 = 0.93), soil nitrate (R-2 = 0.77), and water table depth (R-2 = 0.41). We concluded that model set-up by the user (e.g. inclusion of water table), initial conditions, and early season measurements are very important for accurate predictions of soil water, N and crop yields in this environment.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 738
页数:18
相关论文
共 80 条
[21]   Enhancing APSIM to simulate excessive moisture effects on root growth [J].
Ebrahimi-Mollabashi, Elnaz ;
Huth, Neil I. ;
Holzwoth, Dean P. ;
Ordonez, Raziel A. ;
Hatfield, Jerry L. ;
Huber, Isaiah ;
Castellano, Michael J. ;
Archontoulis, Sotirios V. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2019, 236 :58-67
[22]   Global Patterns of Groundwater Table Depth [J].
Fan, Y. ;
Li, H. ;
Miguez-Macho, G. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 339 (6122) :940-943
[23]  
Fehr W. R., 1977, Special Report, Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University
[24]   Incorporating machine learning with biophysical model can improve the evaluation of climate extremes impacts on wheat yield in south-eastern Australia [J].
Feng, Puyu ;
Wang, Bin ;
Liu, De Li ;
Waters, Cathy ;
Yu, Qiang .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 275 :100-113
[25]   How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis [J].
Grassini, Patricio ;
van Bussel, Lenny G. J. ;
Van Wart, Justin ;
Wolf, Joost ;
Claessens, Lieven ;
Yang, Haishun ;
Boogaard, Hendrik ;
de Groot, Hugo ;
van Ittersum, Martin K. ;
Cassman, Kenneth G. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2015, 177 :49-63
[26]   A REVIEW OF TECHNIQUES FOR PARAMETER SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL-MODELS [J].
HAMBY, DM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1994, 32 (02) :135-154
[27]   The value of skill in seasonal climate forecasting to wheat crop management in a region with high climatic variability [J].
Hammer, GL ;
Holzworth, DP ;
Stone, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1996, 47 (05) :717-737
[28]   Can Changes in Canopy and/or Root System Architecture Explain Historical Maize Yield Trends in the US Corn Belt? [J].
Hammer, Graeme L. ;
Dong, Zhanshan ;
McLean, Greg ;
Doherty, Al ;
Messina, Carlos ;
Schusler, Jeff ;
Zinselmeier, Chris ;
Paszkiewicz, Steve ;
Cooper, Mark .
CROP SCIENCE, 2009, 49 (01) :299-312
[29]   Using a general circulation model to forecast regional wheat yields in northeast Australia [J].
Hansen, JW ;
Potgieter, A ;
Tippett, MK .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2004, 127 (1-2) :77-92
[30]   Linking dynamic seasonal climate forecasts with crop simulation for maize yield prediction in semi-arid Kenya [J].
Hansen, JW ;
Indeje, M .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2004, 125 (1-2) :143-157