Life cycle assessment of ecological sanitation system for small-scale wastewater treatment

被引:69
作者
Benetto, Enrico [1 ]
Nguyen, Diep [1 ]
Lohmann, Torben [1 ]
Schmitt, Bianca [1 ]
Schosseler, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] CRP H Tudor CRTE, L-4002 Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
Life cycle assessment; LCA; Ecological sanitation; Uncertainty; Umberto; Wastewater treatment; URINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological sanitation (EcoSan) concepts, relying on an environmentally sound management of water, nutrient and energy fluxes, have been poorly characterized in literature and are widely ignored by public planning authorities, architects or engineers. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of an EcoSan system at an office building and of conventional systems was carried out in order to provide practical data and information to (partially) fill this gap. Compared to conventional systems, EcoSan can reduce the contribution to ecosystem quality damage by more than 60%. EcoSan leads, however, to higher damages on resources and human health and higher impact on climate change. Key improvement possibilities and research needs related to these results are discussed throughout the paper. Ecological sanitation appears to be a promising alternative to small-scale wastewater treatment. At higher scales, low water consumption conventional systems are better performing and are not likely to be replaced by EcoSan systems in the short term. Standard conventional systems have very poor environmental performances and should be upgraded as far as possible. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1506 / 1516
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database
    Boesch, Michael E.
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Frischknecht, Rolf
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (03) : 181 - 190
  • [2] Reedbeds for greywater treatment - case study in Santa Elena-Monteverde, Costa Rica, central America
    Dallas, S
    Scheffe, B
    Ho, G
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 23 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [3] Ekvall T., 2001, Journal of Cleaner Production, V9, P197
  • [4] Goedkoop M., 2007, Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan, V3, P32, DOI [DOI 10.3370/LCA.3.32, 10.3370/lca.3.32]
  • [5] Guinee J.B., 2004, HDB LIFE CYCLE ASSES, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-306-48055-7
  • [6] Economic allocation:: Examples and derived decision tree
    Guinée, JB
    Heijungs, R
    Huppes, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2004, 9 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [7] An assessment of the effect of human faeces and urine on maize production and water productivity
    Guzha, E
    Nhapi, I
    Rockstrom, J
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2005, 30 (11-16) : 840 - 845
  • [8] Terrestrial ecotoxicity and effect factors of metals in life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Haye, Sebastien
    Slaveykova, Vera I.
    Payet, Jerome
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 68 (08) : 1489 - 1496
  • [9] Human excreta for plant production
    Heinonen-Tanski, H
    van Wijk-Sijbesma, C
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 96 (04) : 403 - 411
  • [10] IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology
    Jolliet, O
    Margni, M
    Charles, R
    Humbert, S
    Payet, J
    Rebitzer, G
    Rosenbaum, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (06) : 324 - 330