How Linguistic Closure and Verbal Working Memory Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise-A Review

被引:117
作者
Besser, Jana [1 ]
Koelewijn, Thomas [1 ]
Zekveld, Adriana A. [1 ,2 ]
Kramer, Sophia E. [1 ]
Festen, Joost M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Linkoping Univ, Linkoping, Sweden
来源
TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION | 2013年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
text reception threshold; working memory span; speech recognition; linguistic closure; RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; HEARING-LOSS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE FUNCTION; TEXT RECOGNITION; CAPACITY; AGE; COMPREHENSION; PERCEPTION; INTELLIGIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/1084713813495459
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ability to recognize masked speech, commonly measured with a speech reception threshold (SRT) test, is associated with cognitive processing abilities. Two cognitive factors frequently assessed in speech recognition research are the capacity of working memory (WM), measured by means of a reading span (Rspan) or listening span (Lspan) test, and the ability to read masked text (linguistic closure), measured by the text reception threshold (TRT). The current article provides a review of recent hearing research that examined the relationship of TRT and WM span to SRTs in various maskers. Furthermore, modality differences in WM capacity assessed with the Rspan compared to the Lspan test were examined and related to speech recognition abilities in an experimental study with young adults with normal hearing (NH). Span scores were strongly associated with each other, but were higher in the auditory modality. The results of the reviewed studies suggest that TRT and WM span are related to each other, but differ in their relationships with SRT performance. In NH adults of middle age or older, both TRT and Rspan were associated with SRTs in speech maskers, whereas TRT better predicted speech recognition in fluctuating nonspeech maskers. The associations with SRTs in steady-state noise were inconclusive for both measures. WM span was positively related to benefit from contextual information in speech recognition, but better TRTs related to less interference from unrelated cues. Data for individuals with impaired hearing are limited, but larger WM span seems to give a general advantage in various listening situations.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 93
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults [J].
Akeroyd, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 :S53-S71
[3]  
Andersson U, 2001, J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ, V6, P103, DOI 10.1093/deafed/6.2.103
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1969, IEEE T ACOUST SPEECH, VAU17, P225
[5]   Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion [J].
Arehart, Kathryn H. ;
Souza, Pamela ;
Baca, Rosalinda ;
Kates, James M. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (03) :251-260
[6]   The emergence of Cognitive Hearing Science [J].
Arlinger, Stig ;
Lunner, Thomas ;
Lyxell, Bjorn ;
Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 50 (05) :371-384
[7]   Working memory [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) :R136-R140
[8]   COMPONENTS OF FLUENT READING [J].
BADDELEY, A ;
LOGIE, R ;
NIMMOSMITH, I ;
BRERETON, N .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (01) :119-131
[9]  
BAILEY IL, 1980, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V57, P378
[10]   Impact of Sensory Acuity on Auditory Working Memory Span in Young and Older Adults [J].
Baldwin, Carryl L. ;
Ash, Ivan K. .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2011, 26 (01) :85-91