Benchmarking physics-informed machine learning-based short term PV-power forecasting tools

被引:33
作者
Pombo, Daniel Vazquez [1 ,2 ]
Bacher, Peder [3 ]
Ziras, Charalampos [1 ]
Bindner, Henrik W. [1 ]
Spataru, Sergiu, V [4 ]
Sorensen, Poul E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Elect Engn, Frederikborsvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Vattenfall AB, R&D Strateg Dev, Evenemangsgatan 13C, S-16956 Solna, Sweden
[3] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Comp Sci, Frederikborsvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[4] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Photovolta Mat & Syst, Frederikborsvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Wind Energy, Frederikborsvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Machine learning; Physics informed; Solar PV; PV power forecasting; SOLAR; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.006
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Uncertainty is one of the core challenges posed by renewable energy integration in power systems, especially for solar photovoltaic (PV), given its dependence on meteorological phenomena. This has motivated the development of numerous forecasting tools, recently focused on physics informed machine learning (ML). Virtually, every paper claims to provide better accuracy than the previous, yet the replicability of these studies is very low, motivating unfair, or erroneous comparisons. This paper reviews and compares the most relevant ML-methods identified in the literature (Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, Convolutional Neural Networks, Long-Short Term Memory and a Hybrid of the last two) with two statistical methods: persistence and an Semi-Parametric Auto-Regressive model. Furthermore, we propose a methodology to integrate a PV-performance model in ML models to forecast power several hours ahead with 5-min resolution. A basic dataset including power production and meteorological measurements is expanded with physics-informed features that capture the relationship between weather and PV operational state, while keeping strong correlation towards the intrinsic feature. This allows the models to learn about the physical interdependence of different features, potentially yielding a higher accuracy than conventional methods. Then, we also propose a physics-informed feature selection to tighten the search-space of the best performer. A case study of a PV array in Denmark is used for validation using both the original and expanded datasets. Results show how the best ML models consistently used physics-informed features in all cases. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6512 / 6520
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A Short Term Forecasting of PV Power Generation Using Couple Based Particle Swarm Optimization Pruned Extreme Learning Machine [J].
Nayak, Niranjan ;
Pani, Alok Kumar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 9 (03) :1190-1202
[22]   Assessing the effective spatial characteristics of input features through physics-informed machine learning models in inundation forecasting during typhoons [J].
Jhong, Bing-Chen ;
Lin, Chung-Yi ;
Jhong, You-Da ;
Chang, Hsiang-Kuan ;
Chu, Jung-Lien ;
Fang, Hsi-Ting .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2022, 67 (10) :1527-1545
[23]   Machine learning-based soil-structure interaction analysis of laterally loaded piles through physics-informed neural networks [J].
Ouyang, Weihang ;
Li, Guanhua ;
Chen, Liang ;
Liu, Si-Wei .
ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2024, 19 (07) :4765-4790
[24]   Machine learning-based fatigue life prediction of metal materials: Perspectives of physics-informed and data-driven hybrid methods [J].
Wang, Haijie ;
Li, Bo ;
Gong, Jianguo ;
Xuan, Fu-Zhen .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2023, 284
[25]   A hybrid deep learning model for short-term PV power forecasting [J].
Li, Pengtao ;
Zhou, Kaile ;
Lu, Xinhui ;
Yang, Shanlin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 259
[26]   A Review of Machine Learning-Based Photovoltaic Output Power Forecasting: Nordic Context [J].
Dimd, Berhane Darsene ;
Voller, Steve ;
Cali, Umit ;
Midtgard, Ole-Morten .
IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 :26404-26425
[27]   Physics-Informed Deep Learning-Based Real-Time Structural Response Prediction Method [J].
Zhou, Ying ;
Meng, Shiqiao ;
Lou, Yujie ;
Kong, Qingzhao .
ENGINEERING, 2024, 35 :140-157
[28]   MODEL CALIBRATION FOR DETONATION PRODUCTS: A PHYSICS-INFORMED, TIME-DEPENDENT SURROGATE METHOD BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING [J].
Zhang, J. ;
Yin, J. ;
Wang, R. ;
Chen, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2020, 10 (03) :277-296
[29]   Short term wind power forecasting using machine learning techniques [J].
Chaudhary, Aditya ;
Sharma, Akash ;
Kumar, Ayush ;
Dikshit, Karan ;
Kumar, Neeraj .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICS & MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 23 (01) :145-156
[30]   PINNs-MPF: An Efficient Physics-Informed Machine Learning-based Solver for Multi-Phase-Field Simulations using Tensorflow [J].
Elfetni, Seifallah ;
Kamachali, Reza Darvishi .
SOFTWARE IMPACTS, 2025, 24