Physical Simulation of Ultrasonic Imaging Logging Response

被引:2
作者
Lu, Junqiang [1 ,2 ]
Han, Jiyong [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Jinping [3 ]
Che, Xiaohua [1 ,2 ]
Qiao, Wenxiao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jiale [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Petr Resources & Prospecting, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Earth Prospecting & Informat Technol, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[3] SINOPEC Engn Technol Res Inst, Beijing 102200, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ultrasonic imaging; fracture response; physical simulation; amplitude;
D O I
10.3390/s22239422
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ultrasonic imaging logging can visually identify the location, shape, dip angle and orientation of fractures and holes. The method has not been effectively applied in the field; one of the prime reasons is that the results of physical simulation experiments are insufficient. The physical simulation of fracture and hole response in the laboratory can provide a reference for the identification and evaluation of the underground geological structure. In this work, ultrasonic scanning experiments are conducted on a grooved sandstone plate and a simulated borehole and the influence of different fractures and holes on ultrasonic pulse echo is studied. Experimental results show that the combination of ultrasonic echo amplitude imaging and arrival time imaging can be used to identify the fracture location, width, depth and orientation, along with accurately calculating the fracture dip angle. The evaluated fracture parameters are similar to those in the physical simulation model. The identification accuracy of the ultrasonic measurement is related to the diameter of the radiation beam of the ultrasonic transducer. A single fracture with width larger than or equal to the radiation beam diameter of the ultrasonic transducer and multiple fractures with spacing longer than or equal to the radiation beam diameter can be effectively identified.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Passive Ultrasonic Beamforming for Fast and Efficient Imaging
    di Scalea, Francesco Lanza
    Huang, Chengyang
    Hosseinzadeh, Ali Zare
    HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS XVIII, 2024, 12951
  • [42] Reliability of semiquantitative ultrasonic perfusion imaging of the brain
    Eyding, J
    Wilkening, W
    Reckhardt, M
    Meves, S
    Postert, T
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2004, 14 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [43] Ultrasonic imaging of nonlinear scatterers buried in a medium
    Haupert, Sylvain
    Renaud, Guillaume
    Schumm, Andreas
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 87 : 1 - 6
  • [44] Ultrasonic Synthetic-Aperture Interface Imaging
    van der Neut, Joost
    Fokkema, Jacob T.
    van den Berg, Peter M.
    Zapf, Michael
    Ruiter, Nicole V.
    Taskin, Ulas
    van Dongen, Koen W. A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2019, 66 (05) : 888 - 897
  • [45] Deep Sub-wavelength Ultrasonic Imaging
    Amireddy, Kiran Kumar
    Balasubramanian, Krishnan
    Rajagopal, Prabhu
    44TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOL 37, 2018, 1949
  • [46] PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF METALLURGICAL PROCESSES
    Mandziej, Stan T.
    MATERIALI IN TEHNOLOGIJE, 2010, 44 (03): : 105 - 119
  • [47] Physical simulation of atmospheric microbursts
    Ferrero, E.
    Mortarini, L.
    Manfrin, M.
    Solari, M.
    Forza, R.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (11) : 6292 - 6305
  • [48] Generalized ultrasonic percussion: imaging of ultrasonic nonlinear parameters and its medical and industrial applications
    Sato, Takuso
    Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Review Papers, 1994, 33 (5 B): : 2833 - 2836
  • [49] Numerical Simulation and Physical Simulation of Sea Wave Groups
    Yu Yuxiu and Gui ManhaiProfessor
    China Ocean Engineering, 1996, (03) : 295 - 305
  • [50] High-Frequency Fiber-Optic Ultrasonic Sensor Using Air Micro-Bubble for Imaging of Seismic Physical Models
    Gang, Tingting
    Hu, Manli
    Rong, Qiangzhou
    Qiao, Xueguang
    Liang, Lei
    Liu, Nan
    Tong, Rongxin
    Liu, Xiaobo
    Bian, Ce
    SENSORS, 2016, 16 (12):