Comparative analysis of two diagnostic methods of human loaiosis:: IgG4 serology and nested-PCR assay.

By evaluating the diagnostic methods developed in our laboratory the prevalence of loaiosis was estimated among 201 individuals from the province of Haut Ogooue in Gabon using IgG4 serology and nested-PCR. The study showed that the prevalence of loaiosis was higher than that described using standard microscopy. IgG4-based ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay) using crude extract of Loa loa microfilariae showed that 80% (35/44) of microfilaraemic individuals (MF') and 56% (88/157) of amicrofilaraemics (AMF) presented antibodies. By contrast, L. loa specific DNA amplified by nested-PCR was detected in all MF and in 68% (106/157) of AMF: Among the 201 samples tested, 95 (47%) gave positive results in both tests. These results indicate that the presence of IgG4 antibodies directed against crude extract of L. loa microfilariae is not linked to the positivity of nested-PCR assay (chi(2) for paired data = 8.78, P < 0,02). We conclude that the PCR assay is more sensitive than the detection of IgG4 antibodies (directed against crude extract of L. loa microfilariae) in detecting loaiosis, and particularly occult loaiosis (infection without circulating microfilariae).