Optimal design and development of a 2-DOF PKM-based machine tool

被引:13
作者
Darvekar, Sanjay [1 ]
Rao, A. B. Koteswara [1 ]
Ganesh, S. Shankar [1 ]
Ramji, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Gayatri Vidya Parishad Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Visakhapatnam 530048, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Andhra Univ, Dept Mech, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
PKM; Global stiffness index; Global conditioning index; Workspace index; MOGA; Comparison with SKM; DIMENSIONAL DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-012-4594-1
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents multiobjective optimization of a typical 2-degree-of-freedom (DOF) parallel kinematic machine (PKM) tool that has only single DOF joints. Nondimensional indices, namely global stiffness index (GSI), global conditioning index (GCI), and workspace index, are considered as the objectives for optimization. The indices GSI and GCI depict the variation of stiffness and dexterity of PKM within the workspace. The leg length and distance between two rails on which actuators slide are treated as design variables as these greatly influence the characteristics of PKM. A multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approach is implemented in MATLAB to find an efficient solution to this complex optimization problem. Fitness function includes inverse kinematics equations, Jacobian and stiffness matrices to compute and optimize the nondimensional indices. First, the optimal value of each index is obtained by single-objective GA. To further improve the results, a hybrid function PATTERNSEARCH is used. This helps to select appropriate boundary conditions for MOGA. To obtain the optimal values of all the three indices, a multiobjective GA is carried out. The results are compared with a conventional exhaustive search method of optimization. The obtained results show that the use of MOGA enhances the quality of the optimization outcome. Secondly, a prototype has been designed and developed with the optimal dimensions. The actual workspace of the PKM and influence of leg collision on the workspace are studied. Finally, a preliminary experimentation was carried out. A comparison between PKM and the three-axis serial kinematic machine tool is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1609 / 1621
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Bone IA, 1999, P ASME DES ENG TECH
[2]  
Central Machine Tool Institute, 1982, MACH TOOL DES HDB, P562
[3]   A direct comparison of the machining performance of a variax 5 axis parallel kinetic machining centre with conventional 3 and 5 axis machine tools [J].
Geldart, M ;
Webb, P ;
Larsson, H ;
Backstrom, M ;
Gindy, N ;
Rask, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2003, 43 (11) :1107-1116
[4]   A GLOBAL PERFORMANCE INDEX FOR THE KINEMATIC OPTIMIZATION OF ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS [J].
GOSSELIN, C ;
ANGELES, J .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1991, 113 (03) :220-226
[5]  
Koteswara Rao AB, 2006, P INT C PCEA IFTOMM
[6]   Kinematics, dynamics and dimensional synthesis of a novel 2-DoF translational manipulator [J].
Liu, XJ ;
Wang, QM ;
Wang, JS .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2005, 41 (04) :205-224
[7]  
Majou F, 2002, NOVEL METHOD DESIGN
[8]  
MATLAB, 2012, MATHWORKS OPT TOOLB
[9]  
Merlet J.P., 2000, PARALLEL ROBOTS
[10]  
Merlet JP, 2002, WORKSH FUND ISS FUT