Biomechanical Analysis of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement With a Stand-alone U-shaped Disc Implant

被引:16
作者
Li, Yang [1 ]
Fogel, Guy R. [2 ]
Liao, Zhenhua [3 ]
Tyagi, Rajnesh [4 ]
Zhang, Gaolong [1 ]
Liu, Weiqiang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Spine Pain Begone Clin, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ Shenzhen, Res Inst, Biomech & Biotechnol Lab, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Indian Inst Technol BHU Varanasi, Dept Mech Engn, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
cervical biomechanic; combined structure; prosthesis; replacement; stand-alone; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL; ARTIFICIAL DISC; SINGLE-LEVEL; ANTERIOR DISKECTOMY; PRODISC-C; FOLLOW-UP; FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; SPINE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002128
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Biomechanical study using a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model. Objective. To analyze biomechanical changes with three prostheses based on two-level arthroplasty and to verify the biomechanical efficiency of dynamic cervical implants (DCIs) with a stand-alone U-shaped structure. Summary of Background Data. Few studies have compared biomechanical behavior of various prostheses as they relate with clinical results after two-level total disc replacement. Methods. Three arthroplasty devices Mobi-C, porous coated motion (PCM), and DCI were inserted at the C4-C6 disc space and analyzed. Displacement loading was applied to the center of the endplate at the C3 level to simulate flexion and extension motions. Results. The motion distributions in extension with DCI and in flexion with DCI and Mobi-C were relatively close to that in the intact model. Mobi-C and PCM obviously increased the combined extension range of motion at the index levels, but both resulted in about 45% decrease in extension moment. DCI showed a trend in strain energy similar to that of healthy discs. PCM exhibited a facet joint stress distribution almost similar to that of the intact model. DCI did not generate significant overloading at cartilage between the index levels, whereas the maximum facet joint stress increased with Mobi-C was about 39%. The maximum stress on a ultrahigh molecular-weight-polyethylene core was above the yield stress (42.43 MPa for Mobi-C and 30.94 MPa for PCM). Conclusion. Each prosthesis shows its biomechanical advantages and disadvantages. However, DCI has the capacity to preserve motion and store energy under external loading, similar to the behavior of normal discs. Compared with Mobi-C, both DCI and PCM showed a lower stress at cartilage between index levels, which may avoid facet joint degeneration to some extent. Such a well-controlled arthroplasty device with a stand-alone structure may be a potential candidate and needs to be investigated in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:E1173 / E1181
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of 1-and 2-Level Total Disc Replacement [J].
Bae, Hyun W. ;
Kim, Kee D. ;
Nunley, Pierce Dalton ;
Jackson, Robert J. ;
Hisey, Michael S. ;
Davis, Reginald J. ;
Hoffman, Gregory A. ;
Gaede, Steven E. ;
Danielson, Guy O., III ;
Peterson, Daniel L. ;
Stokes, John M. ;
Araghi, Ali .
SPINE, 2015, 40 (11) :759-766
[2]   Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C®) with up to 2 years of follow-up [J].
Beaurain, J. ;
Bernard, P. ;
Dufour, T. ;
Fuentes, J. M. ;
Hovorka, I. ;
Huppert, J. ;
Steib, J. P. ;
Vital, J. M. ;
Aubourg, L. ;
Vila, T. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (06) :841-850
[3]   Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and Prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [J].
Chang, Ung-Kyu ;
Kim, Daniel H. ;
Lee, Max C. ;
Willenberg, Rafer ;
Kim, Se-Hoon ;
Lim, Jesse .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (01) :40-46
[4]   Motion Preservation and Clinical Outcome of Porous Coated Motion Cervical Disk Arthroplasty [J].
Choi, David ;
Petrik, Vladimir ;
Fox, Sally ;
Parkinson, Joy ;
Timothy, Jake ;
Gullan, Richard .
NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 71 (01) :30-36
[5]   Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics [J].
Cunningham, Bryan W. ;
Hu, Nianbin ;
Zorn, Candace M. ;
McAfee, Paul C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (04) :341-349
[6]   Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results [J].
Davis, Reginald J. ;
Nunley, Pierce Dalton ;
Kim, Kee D. ;
Hisey, Michael S. ;
Jackson, Robert J. ;
Bae, Hyun W. ;
Hoffman, Gregory A. ;
Gaede, Steven E. ;
Danielson, Guy O., III ;
Gordon, Charles ;
Stone, Marcus B. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 22 (01) :15-25
[7]   Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial [J].
Davis, Reginald J. ;
Kim, Kee D. ;
Hisey, Michael S. ;
Hoffman, Gregory A. ;
Bae, Hyun W. ;
Gaede, Steven E. ;
Rashbaum, Ralph F. ;
Nunley, Pierce Dalton ;
Peterson, Daniel L. ;
Stokes, John K. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (05) :532-545
[8]   Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc [J].
Denozière, G ;
Ku, DN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 39 (04) :766-775
[9]   Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion [J].
Eck, JC ;
Humphreys, SC ;
Lim, TH ;
Jeong, ST ;
Kim, JG ;
Hodges, SD ;
An, HS .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2431-2434
[10]   Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation [J].
Faizan, Ahmad ;
Goel, Vijay K. ;
Garfin, Steven R. ;
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Serhan, Hassan ;
Biyani, Ashok ;
Elgafy, Hossein ;
Krishna, Manoj ;
Friesem, Tai .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 :S653-S662