Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15

被引:72
|
作者
Kleif, J. [1 ]
Edwards, H. M. [2 ]
Sort, R. [3 ]
Vilandt, J. [1 ]
Gogenur, I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Nordsjaellands Hosp, Dept Surg, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Herlev Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Herlev, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Herlev Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Herlev, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Koge Sygehus, Dept Surg, Koge, Denmark
关键词
GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; HEALTH-STATUS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1111/aas.12525
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatient perceived quality of recovery is an important outcome after surgery and should be measured in clinical trials. Quality of recovery after surgery and general anaesthesia can be measured by the QoR-15. A high score indicates a good recovery and the score ranges from 0 to 150. The aim of this study was to translate the QoR-15 questionnaire into Danish and do a full psychometric evaluation of the Danish version. MethodsA translation and cultural adaption of the original version of the QoR-15 into a Danish version, the QoR-15D, was performed. After obtaining consent, patients undergoing elective abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Patients completed the QoR-15D before surgery and on the first postoperative day. The validity, reliability, responsiveness and clinical feasibility of the QoR-15D were evaluated. ResultsOne hundred and forty patients returned their pre- and postoperative questionnaire successfully giving a completion rate of 56%. The postoperative QoR-15 score was negatively correlated with duration of surgery (=-0.21, 95% CI: -0.04 to -0.36, P<0.02) and postoperative stay (=-0.28, 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.43, P<0.01). Postoperative QoR-15D scores were inversely related to the extent of surgery: minor, intermediate or major (12722, 106 +/- 29 and 96 +/- 24, respectively, P<0.01). Cronbach's alpha and split-half reliability was 0.90 and 0.88. Test-retest reliability was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00). Cohen's effect size was 1.13 and the standardized response mean was 0.82. ConclusionThe QoR-15D has preserved the validity, excellent reliability, high degree of responsiveness and the clinical feasibility of the original English version.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15
    Bergestuen, Linda
    Moger, Thomas
    Oterhals, Kjersti
    Pfeffer, Frank
    Nestvold, Torunn
    Norderval, Stig
    Nymo, Linn Save
    Havnes, Kjerstin
    Lassen, Kristoffer
    Breivik, Kyrre
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 68 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [2] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score The QoR-15
    Stark, Peter A.
    Myles, Paul S.
    Burke, Justin A.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 118 (06) : 1332 - 1340
  • [3] Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15)
    Kara, Umut
    Simsek, Fatih
    Kamburoglu, Hasan
    Ozhan, Mehmet Ozgur
    Alakus, Umit
    Ince, Mehmet Emin
    Eksert, Sami
    Ozkan, Gokhan
    Eskin, Mehmet Burak
    Senkal, Serkan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 52 (02) : 427 - +
  • [4] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire
    Aslanlar, Emine
    Aslanlar, Durmus Ali
    Doganay, Cennet
    Onal, Oezkan
    Sargin, Mehmet
    Cicekci, Faruk
    Kara, Fatih
    Kara, Inci
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (16) : E37867
  • [5] Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40
    Tanaka, Yuu
    Wakita, Takafumi
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    Nishiwada, Makoto
    Inoue, Satoki
    Kawaguchi, Masahiko
    Furuya, Hitoshi
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2011, 25 (04) : 509 - 515
  • [6] Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the postoperative quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire for Spanish-speaking patients: A prospective cohort study
    Morales-Ariza, Victor
    Loaiza-Aldean, Yuri
    de Miguel, Marcos
    Pena-Navarro, Mireia
    Martinez -Silva, Olga
    Gonzalez-Tallada, Anna
    Manrique-Munoz, Susana
    de Nadal, Miriam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 225 (04) : 740 - 747
  • [7] Validation of the Arabic version of the postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 score
    Essafti, Meryem
    Bahi, Mohammed
    Haji, Kamal
    Lahouidek, Khalid
    Myatt, Ismail
    El Fassiki, Noureddine
    El Baraka, Hakim
    Belhadj, Ayoub
    Aissaoui, Younes
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 131 (06) : E187 - E190
  • [8] Factor structure of post-operative quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15): An Italian adaptation and validation
    Rosato, Rosalba
    Palazzo, Valentina
    Borghi, Felice
    Camanni, Marco
    Puppo, Andrea
    Delpiano, Elena Maria
    Pellegrino, Luca
    Piovano, Elisa
    Rizzo, Alessio
    Rolfo, Monica
    Morino, Mario
    Allaix, Marco Ettore
    Testa, Silvia
    Ciccone, Giovannino
    Pagano, Eva
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [9] Translation and validation of the Hindi version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15H) questionnaire: A prospective cohort study
    Chilkoti, Geetanjali T.
    Beniwal, Manoj
    Saxena, Ashok K.
    Malhotra, Rajeev K.
    Tiwari, Spriha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 69 (04) : 393 - 401
  • [10] Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia
    Kleif, J.
    Waage, J.
    Christensen, K. B.
    Gogenur, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (01) : 28 - 36