Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15

被引:79
作者
Kleif, J. [1 ]
Edwards, H. M. [2 ]
Sort, R. [3 ]
Vilandt, J. [1 ]
Gogenur, I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Nordsjaellands Hosp, Dept Surg, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Herlev Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Herlev, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Herlev Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Herlev, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Koge Sygehus, Dept Surg, Koge, Denmark
关键词
GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; HEALTH-STATUS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1111/aas.12525
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatient perceived quality of recovery is an important outcome after surgery and should be measured in clinical trials. Quality of recovery after surgery and general anaesthesia can be measured by the QoR-15. A high score indicates a good recovery and the score ranges from 0 to 150. The aim of this study was to translate the QoR-15 questionnaire into Danish and do a full psychometric evaluation of the Danish version. MethodsA translation and cultural adaption of the original version of the QoR-15 into a Danish version, the QoR-15D, was performed. After obtaining consent, patients undergoing elective abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Patients completed the QoR-15D before surgery and on the first postoperative day. The validity, reliability, responsiveness and clinical feasibility of the QoR-15D were evaluated. ResultsOne hundred and forty patients returned their pre- and postoperative questionnaire successfully giving a completion rate of 56%. The postoperative QoR-15 score was negatively correlated with duration of surgery (=-0.21, 95% CI: -0.04 to -0.36, P<0.02) and postoperative stay (=-0.28, 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.43, P<0.01). Postoperative QoR-15D scores were inversely related to the extent of surgery: minor, intermediate or major (12722, 106 +/- 29 and 96 +/- 24, respectively, P<0.01). Cronbach's alpha and split-half reliability was 0.90 and 0.88. Test-retest reliability was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00). Cohen's effect size was 1.13 and the standardized response mean was 0.82. ConclusionThe QoR-15D has preserved the validity, excellent reliability, high degree of responsiveness and the clinical feasibility of the original English version.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995-2008: A Meta-analytic Review and Guidelines for Survey Researchers [J].
Anseel, Frederik ;
Lievens, Filip ;
Schollaert, Eveline ;
Choragwicka, Beata .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (03) :335-349
[2]  
BLANCHARD CG, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V65, P186, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900101)65:1<186::AID-CNCR2820650136>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-4
[4]   Effect of patient sex on general anaesthesia and recovery [J].
Buchanan, F. F. ;
Myles, P. S. ;
Cicuttini, Flavia M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (06) :832-839
[5]  
Choung RS, 2012, J PUBLIC HLTH BANGKO, V21, P87
[6]   What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? [J].
Frost, Marlene H. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Liepa, Astra M. ;
Stauffer, Joseph W. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Sloan, Jeff A. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 :S94-S105
[7]   Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review [J].
Gornall, B. F. ;
Myles, P. S. ;
Smith, C. L. ;
Burke, J. A. ;
Leslie, K. ;
Pereira, M. J. ;
Bost, J. E. ;
Kluivers, K. B. ;
Nilsson, U. G. ;
Tanaka, Y. ;
Forbes, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (02) :161-169
[8]   A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery [J].
Herrera, Francisco J. ;
Wong, Jean ;
Chung, Frances .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 105 (01) :63-69
[9]   Validation of the Turkish version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire [J].
Karaman, Serkan ;
Arici, Semih ;
Dogru, Serkan ;
Karaman, Tugba ;
Tapar, Hakan ;
Kaya, Ziya ;
Suren, Mustafa ;
Balta, Mehtap Gurler .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12
[10]   EFFECT SIZES FOR INTERPRETING CHANGES IN HEALTH-STATUS [J].
KAZIS, LE ;
ANDERSON, JJ ;
MEENAN, RF .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) :S178-S189