Incorporation of international risk management standards into federal regulations

被引:0
作者
Rezende Nunes de Souza, Flavio Sergio [1 ]
de Azevedo Braga, Marcus Vinicius [2 ]
Moreira da Cunha, Armando Santos [1 ]
de Sales, Patrick Del Bosco [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira Adm Publ & Empresas, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Econ, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA | 2020年 / 54卷 / 01期
关键词
enterprise risk management; public administration; COSO ERM; ISO; 31000; Brazil; GLOBAL DIFFUSION; UNITED-STATES; POLICY-MAKING; ORGANIZATIONS; COMPETITION; GOVERNMENT; ADOPTION; ISO-9000; LESSONS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1590/0034-761220180117
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The issue of risk management has gained attention in the field of administration due to the dissemination of international frameworks. In Brazilian federal public administration, risk management is a recent and expanding practice. This research analyzes how international corporate risk management frameworks have been adopted by the federal government through regulations and guidelines. The study adopts the concepts of coercive, normative, and mimetic forces from the neo-institutional theory, and examines the presence of international norms in the Brazilian regulations. Through a qualitative approach, content analysis in documents, norms, interviews, and seminars was used to identify traits of the COSO ERM and ISO 31000/2009 frameworks, which were chosen based on relevance. Results identify important actors pushing for the use of international frameworks, such as international organizations, professional associations, and public agencies, especially those related to government audits. Despite the strong international influence, the Brazilian norms are adapted to the organizations' context and allowing the maintenance of national autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 78
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Amenta E, 2010, HANDB SOCIOL SOC RES, P15, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ISO 31000
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Instrucao Normativa Conjunta n 1, de 10 de maio de 2016, do Ministerio do Planejamento, Orcamento e Gestao e ControladoriaGeral da Uniao
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Instrucao Normativa SDA n10, de 3 de Marco de 2017. Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EX SUMM ENT RISK MAN
[6]  
Azevedo R. R. de, 2019, Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, V12, P4, DOI [10.14392/ASAA.2019120201, DOI 10.14392/ASAA.2019120201]
[7]  
Bardin L., 2011, Analise de Conteudo
[8]   A Comparison of the Local Authority Adoption of Risk Management in England and Australia [J].
Collier, Paul M. ;
Woods, Margaret .
AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 21 (02) :111-123
[9]  
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2017, ENT RISK MAN INT RIS
[10]   Second order change in UK local government: the case of risk management [J].
Crawford, Margaret ;
Stein, William .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2005, 18 (05) :414-+