RANS simulation of ABL flow over complex terrains applying an Enhanced k-ε model and wall function formulation: Implementation and comparison for fluent and OpenFOAM

被引:118
作者
Balogh, M. [1 ]
Parente, A. [2 ]
Benocci, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Fluid Mech, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Univ Libre Brussels, Serv AerothermoMecan, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Von Korman Inst Fluid Dynam, Environm & Appl Fluid Dynam Dept, Rhode St Genese, Belgium
关键词
RANS; ABL; CFD simulation; Enhanced k-epsilon model; Complex terrain; ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER; TURBULENCE MODEL; WIND; DISPERSION; HILL; LES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2012.02.023
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The simulation of Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) flows is commonly performed using commercial CFD codes with RANS turbulence modeling, applying the standard k-epsilon model. However, when applied to the simulation of the homogenous ABL, this approach may result in an undesired decay of the velocity and turbulent fully-developed profiles specified at the inlet of the computational domain. This behavior is due to an inconsistency between turbulence model, inflow conditions and wall function formulation. An approach has been introduced recently to overcome this problem, which consists in the modification of the turbulence model and wall function formulation to retrieve an overall consistent treatment of the neutral ABL. Such methodology, previously applied to simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer over flat terrain and ground-mounted bluff bodies, is here applied to the simulation of the flow over complex terrains and hills, at wind tunnel and atmosphere scale. In a time of limited scientific funding, the availability of open source CFD software such as OpenFOAM is a very attractive option to investigate; therefore, a comparison between OpenFOAM and the commercial code FLUENT 13.0 has been carried out in the present paper. The potential of the proposed methodology and the satisfactory performances of OpenFOAM are demonstrated. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 368
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS TU DENMARK
[2]  
Bechmann A., 2009, D91 SECURESCM
[3]   CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings - effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow [J].
Blocken, Bert ;
Carmeliet, Jan ;
Stathopoulos, Ted .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2007, 95 (9-11) :941-962
[4]   CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems [J].
Blocken, Bert ;
Stathopoulos, Ted ;
Carmeliet, Jan .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (02) :238-252
[5]  
Castro F.A., 2003, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V125, P85
[6]   Simulation of the Askervein flow.: Part 1:: Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations (k-ε turbulence model) [J].
Castro, FA ;
Palma, JMLM ;
Lopes, AS .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2003, 107 (03) :501-530
[7]  
Crasto G., 2007, NUMERICAL SIMULATION
[8]   Comparison Between Large-Eddy Simulation and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Computations for the MUST Field Experiment. Part II: Effects of Incident Wind Angle Deviation on the Mean Flow and Plume Dispersion [J].
Dejoan, A. ;
Santiago, J. L. ;
Martilli, A. ;
Martin, F. ;
Pinelli, A. .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2010, 135 (01) :133-150
[9]  
Donat J., 1995, THESIS U HAMBURG
[10]  
Franke J, 2007, 732 COST