Oral terbinafine in the treatment of multi-site seborrheic dermatitis: A multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled study

被引:18
作者
Vena, GA
Micali, G
Santoianni, P
Cassano, N
Peruzzi, E
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Policlin, Unit Dermatol 2, Dept Internal Med Immunol & Infect Dis, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[2] Univ Catania, Dermatol Clin, Catania, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dermatol Clin, Naples, Italy
[4] Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, VA, Italy
关键词
oral terbinafine; double-blind/placebo-controlled trial; seborrhoeic dermatitis; treatment;
D O I
10.1177/039463200501800418
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a common disorder for which no satisfactory curative treatment exists. Preliminary studies suggest that terbinafine may be effective. The efficacy and tolerability of oral terbinafine was evaluated in multi-site SD in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. For this purpose, 174 adult patients with SD lesions involving >= 3 skin areas, each causing >= 2 moderate/severe symptoms according to a pre-defined clinical score, were classified according to the localization of lesions: patients with lesions predominantly involving non-exposed skin areas, such as scalp and hairline and sternum and/or interscapular area (Population A, n=83) or patients with lesions in exposed sites, mainly the face (Population B, n=91). Patients were randomized to oral terbinafine (250 mg/day) (n=86) or matching placebo (n=88), each given for 6 weeks. Primary efficacy variable was the response rate, defined as >= 50% decrease in baseline total clinical score without rescue medication intake after 6 weeks of treatment. The main secondary assessments were: subject's global assessment of relief and proportion of patients satisfied with treatment. Recurrence rate was assessed in responder patients during a 4-week treatment-free period. In Population A the response rate after 6 weeks of treatment was significantly higher with terbinafine (70% vs 45.4%; p=0.03) and so was the proportion of patients who reported relief (75% vs 41%; p=0.007) and who were satisfied (66% vs 40%; p=0.02). No significant differences were recorded in Population B. Adverse events occurred in 11.5% of terbinafine patients and 8% of placebo patients. One patient discontinued treatment with terbinafine because of adverse events (mild tachycardia and insomnia). In conclusion, our results show that terbinafine is significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the severity of SD lesions in non-exposed sites. Clinical trials comparing terbinafine to standard treatment regimens in different types of patients with SD are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 753
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of zinc sulfate in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Bilici, M
    Yildirim, F
    Kandil, S
    Bekaroglu, M
    Yildirmis, S
    Deger, O
    Ülgen, M
    Yildiran, A
    Aksu, H
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 28 (01) : 181 - 190
  • [23] Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin in the treatment of painful ejaculation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    M R Safarinejad
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2006, 18 : 527 - 533
  • [24] The effectiveness of ultrasound treatment for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study
    Kapci Yildiz, Serap
    Unlu Ozkan, Feyza
    Aktas, Ilknur
    Silte, Ayse Duygu
    Yilmaz Kaysin, Meryem
    Bilgin Badur, Naciye
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 45 (06) : 1187 - 1191
  • [25] Lithium for the Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Discontinuation Study
    Findling, Robert L.
    McNamara, Nora K.
    Pavuluri, Mani
    Frazier, Jean A.
    Rynn, Moira
    Scheffer, Russell
    Kafantaris, Vivian
    Robb, Adelaide
    DelBello, Melissa
    Kowatch, Robert A.
    Rowles, Brieana M.
    Lingler, Jacqui
    Zhao, Jian
    Clemons, Traci
    Martz, Karen
    Anand, Ravinder
    Taylor-Zapata, Perdita
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 58 (02) : 287 - +
  • [26] A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adalimumab in the treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis
    Pariser, Robert J.
    Paul, Joan
    Hirano, Stefanie
    Torosky, Cyndi
    Smith, Molly
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 68 (05) : 765 - 773
  • [27] A Multicenter Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Escitalopram in Children and Adolescents with Generalized Anxiety Disorder
    Strawn, Jeffrey R.
    Moldauer, Leslie
    Hahn, Rebekah D.
    Wise, Alexandria
    Bertzos, Kristina
    Eisenberg, Beth
    Greenberg, Edward
    Liu, Chengcheng
    Gopalkrishnan, Mallika
    McVoy, Molly
    Knutson, James A.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 33 (03) : 91 - 100
  • [28] Metadoxine in acute alcohol intoxication: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
    Shpilenya, LS
    Muzychenko, AP
    Gasbarrini, G
    Addolorato, G
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 26 (03) : 340 - 346
  • [29] Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Quetiapine in Anorexia Nervosa
    Powers, Pauline S.
    Klabunde, Megan
    Kaye, Walter
    EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW, 2012, 20 (04) : 331 - 334
  • [30] Efficacy of N-Acetylcysteine in the Treatment of Nicotine Dependence: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study
    Schmaal, Lianne
    Berk, Lotte
    Hulstijn, Kai P.
    Cousijn, Janna
    Wiers, Reinout W.
    van den Brink, Wim
    EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 2011, 17 (04) : 211 - 216