Network analysis and qualitative discourse analysis of a classroom group discussion

被引:12
作者
Bruun, Jesper [1 ]
Lindahl, Mats [2 ]
Linder, Cedric [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Dept Sci Educ, Oester Voldgade 3, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Linnaeeus Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Chem & Biomed Sci, Vaxjo, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Phys Educ Res, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Western Cape, Dept Phys & Astron, Cape Town, South Africa
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Discourse analysis; network analysis; classroom group discussion; socioscientific issues; educational design and practice; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DECISION-MAKING; SCIENCE; ARGUMENTATION; DISCUSSIONS; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1080/1743727X.2018.1496414
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A new methodology is proposed for qualitative discourse analysis (QDA) aimed at gaining enhanced insights into learning possibilities and indicators that arise during classroom group discussions. The constitution of this new methodology has two principle components: a discourse analysis approach that aims to identify the relationships between content and group dynamics; and a network analysis (NA) approach that uses the same data to identify meaning-related structural dynamics found in the data. The proposed methodology pairs these two components to create a supplementary iterative interchange that facilitates the attainment of greater analytic insights than are achievable by either of the two components individually. The critical aspects of the methodology are illustrated and discussed using real classroom data in ways that provide a procedural exemplar. The strengths and limitations of the proposed methodology are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 339
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Towards graphical models for text processing [J].
Aggarwal, Charu C. ;
Zhao, Peixiang .
KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 36 (01) :1-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Complexity and Education
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Metodoloski zvezki, DOI DOI 10.1002/SMJ.444
[5]  
Antaki C., 2003, Discourse Analysis Online, P1
[6]   Degree landscapes in scale-free networks [J].
Axelsen, Jacob Bock ;
Bernhardsson, Sebastian ;
Rosvall, Martin ;
Sneppen, Kim ;
Trusina, Ala .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2006, 74 (03)
[7]   Mapping university students' epistemic framing of computational physics using network analysis [J].
Bodin, Madelen .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2012, 8 (01)
[8]  
Bohlin Ludvig, 2014, inMeasuringScholarlyImpact, P3
[9]   Exploring classroom interaction with dynamic social network analysis [J].
Bokhove, Christian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2018, 41 (01) :17-37
[10]   Using module analysis for multiple choice responses: A new method applied to Force Concept Inventory data [J].
Brewe, Eric ;
Bruun, Jesper ;
Bearden, Ian G. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2016, 12 (02)