Linear deterministic accumulator models of simple choice

被引:72
作者
Heathcote, Andrew [1 ]
Love, Jonathon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2012年 / 3卷
关键词
evidence accumulation; mathematical modeling; response time; linear ballistic accumulator; lexical-decision task; PERCEPTUAL DECISION-MAKING; RESPONSE-TIME DATA; DIFFUSION-MODEL; ACCURACY; DISTRIBUTIONS; SPEED; WALD; ACTIVATION; PARAMETERS; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00292
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We examine theories of simple choice as a race among evidence accumulation processes. We focus on the class of deterministic race models, which assume that the effects of fluctuations in the parameters of the accumulation processes between-choice trials (between-choice noise) dominate the effects of fluctuations occurring while making a choice (within-choice noise) in behavioral data (i.e., response times and choices). The latter deterministic approximation, when combined with the assumption that accumulation is linear, leads to a class of models that can be readily applied to simple-choice behavior because they are computationally tractable. We develop a new and mathematically simple exemplar within the class of linear deterministic models, the Lognormal race (LNR). We then examine how the LNR, and another widely applied linear deterministic model, Brown and Heathcote's (2008) LBA, account for a range of benchmark simple-choice effects in lexical-decision task data reported by Wagenmakers et al. (2008). Our results indicate that the LNR provides an accurate description of this data. Although the LBA model provides a slightly better account, both models support similar psychological conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [61] Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence
    Tsetsos, Konstantinos
    Usher, Marius
    McClelland, James L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 5
  • [62] INFORMATION-PROCESSING MODELS GENERATING LOGNORMALLY DISTRIBUTED REACTION-TIMES
    ULRICH, R
    MILLER, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 37 (04) : 513 - 525
  • [63] The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model
    Usher, M
    McClelland, JL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) : 550 - 592
  • [64] Neural Correlates of Trial-to-Trial Fluctuations in Response Caution
    van Maanen, Leendert
    Brown, Scott D.
    Eichele, Tom
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    Ho, Tiffany
    Serences, John
    Forstmann, Birte U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (48) : 17488 - 17495
  • [65] Vickers D., 1979, DECISION PROCESSES V
  • [66] Model Selection and Psychological Theory: A Discussion of the Differences Between the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)
    Vrieze, Scott I.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 17 (02) : 228 - 243
  • [67] A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    Ratcliff, Roger
    Gomez, Pablo
    McKoon, Gail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 58 (01) : 140 - 159
  • [68] An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    van der Maas, Han L. J.
    Grasman, Raoul P. P. P.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [69] Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection
    White, Corey N.
    Ratcliff, Roger
    Starns, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 63 (04) : 210 - 238
  • [70] Neural circuit dynamics underlying accumulation of time-varying evidence during perceptual decision making
    Wong, Kong-Fatt
    Huk, Alexander C.
    Shadlen, Michael N.
    Wang, Xiao-Jing
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 1