Uncovering patients' concerns in routine head and neck oncology follow up clinics: an exploratory study

被引:24
作者
Ghazali, N. [1 ]
Roe, B. [2 ]
Lowe, D. [2 ]
Rogers, S. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aintree Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Reg Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool L9 1AE, Merseyside, England
[2] Edge Hill Univ, Fac Hlth, Evidence Based Practice Res Ctr EPRC, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England
关键词
Unmet needs; Patient Concerns Inventory; Head & Neck Cancer; Patient-doctor communication; Cancer; CONCERNS INVENTORY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) is a tool that enables patients to highlight issues they wish to discuss, and helps to uncover concerns that might otherwise be missed. Previous PCI studies have involved direct observation of a consultation by one assessor using a coding method based rigidly on items listed on the inventory. This pilot study explores the feasibility of developing a standardised method of scoring which can be used to evaluate it. We prospectively recruited 40 disease-free patients attending 42 routine outpatient consultations after treatment for head and neck cancer. Before the consultation they completed the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire and the PCI. Nineteen consultations were audio-recorded and transcribed, and 2 assessors used a thematic framework to analyse the content of the consultation to find the number and types of concerns, the professionals involved, and the clinical outcomes. The assessors were in agreement about 80% (65/81) of the audio-recordings. The mean number of items of concern highlighted on the PCI before consultation was 5.95, median (IQR) 4(3-8) in contrast to 6.47, median (IQR) 6(4-9) for those discussed; for involvement of professionals it was 0.74, median (IQR) 0(0-1) in contrast to 2.63, median (IQR) 3(1-4), respectively. We identified 4 new themes for the working thematic framework, which provided a dynamic, standardised, and comprehensive approach based on the observation and responses of those studied. This approach gave an insight into the way the PCI mediates consultations, and how patients do not always understand the support that specific professionals can provide. Overall, patients were satisfied with the consultations. (C) 2012 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 300
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Epstein RL, 2007, NIH PUBLICATION, V222, DOI DOI 10.1037/E481972008-001
[2]   Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues [J].
Epstein, RM ;
Franks, P ;
Fiscella, K ;
Shields, CG ;
Meldrum, SC ;
Kravitz, RL ;
Duberstein, PR .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (07) :1516-1528
[3]  
Ereaut G., 2008, Report
[4]   Identifying appearance-related concerns in routine follow-up clinics following treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer [J].
Flexen, J. ;
Ghazali, N. ;
Lowe, D. ;
Rogers, S. N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 50 (04) :314-320
[5]   Use of the Patient Concerns Inventory to identify speech and swallowing concerns following treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer [J].
Ghazali, N. ;
Kanatas, A. ;
Scott, B. ;
Lowe, D. ;
Zuydam, A. ;
Rogers, S. N. .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2012, 126 (08) :800-808
[6]  
Ghazali N, 2012, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, DOI [10.1002/pon.3069, DOI 10.1002/P0N.3069]
[7]   Treatment referral before and after the introduction of the Liverpool Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) into routine head and neck oncology outpatient clinics [J].
Ghazali, Naseem ;
Kanatas, Anastasios ;
Langley, Daniel J. R. ;
Scott, Barry ;
Lowe, Derek ;
Rogers, Simon N. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2011, 19 (11) :1879-1886
[8]   Development and testing of a visit-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire: The Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction with Doctor Questionnaire [J].
Loblaw, DA ;
Bezjak, A ;
Bunston, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) :1931-1938
[9]   RIGOUR AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH [J].
MAYS, N ;
POPE, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (6997) :109-112
[10]  
Miles M.B., 2014, Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1016/0149-7189(96)88232-2