Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up

被引:109
|
作者
Kolcun, John Paul G. [1 ]
Brusko, G. Damian [1 ]
Basil, Gregory W. [1 ]
Epstein, Richard [2 ]
Wang, Michael Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
lumbar fusion; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; awake fusion; enhanced recovery after surgery; length of stay; outcomes; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGERY; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.12.FOCUS18701
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Open spinal fusion surgery is often associated with significant blood loss, postoperative pain, and prolonged recovery times. Seeking to minimize surgical and perioperative morbidity, the authors adopted an endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) technique performed without general anesthesia. In this report, they present data on the first 100 patients treated with this procedure. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of the first 100 patients who underwent awake endoscopic MIS-TLIF at a single institution between 2014 and 2017. Surgery was performed while the patient was sedated but without intubation or the use of general anesthetic or narcotic agents. Long-lasting (liposomal) bupivacaine was used for local analgesia. The discectomy and placement of an expandable interbody graft were performed endoscopically, followed by percutaneous pedicle screw implantation. Inclusion criteria for the procedure consisted of diagnosis of degenerative disc disease with grade I or II spondylolisthesis and evidence of spinal stenosis or nerve impingement with intractable symptomatology. RESULTS Of the first 100 patients, 56 were female and 44 were male. Single-level fusion was performed in 84 patients and two-level fusion in 16 patients. The most commonly fused level was L4-5, representing 77% of all fused levels. The mean (+/- standard deviation) operative time was 84.5 +/- 21.7 minutes for one-level fusions and 128.1 +/- 48.6 minutes for two-level procedures. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 65.4 +/- 76.6 ml for one-level fusions and 74.7 +/- 33.6 ml for two-level fusions. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.4 +/- 1.0 days. Four deaths occurred in the 100 patients; all four of those patients died from complications unrelated to surgery. In 82% of the surviving patients, 1-year follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) data were available. The mean preoperative ODI score was 29.6 +/- 15.3 and the mean postoperative ODI score was 17.2 +/- 16.9, which represents a significant mean reduction in the ODI score of -12.3 using a two-tailed paired t-test (p = 0.000001). In four cases, the surgical plan was revised to include general endotracheal anesthesia intraoperatively and was successfully completed. Other complications included two cases of cage migration, one case of osteomyelitis, and one case of endplate fracture; three of these complications occurred in the first 50 cases. CONCLUSIONS This series of the first 100 patients to undergo awake endoscopic MIS-TLIF demonstrates outcomes comparable to those reported in our earlier papers. This procedure can provide a safe and efficacious option for lumbar fusion with less morbidity than open surgery. Further refinements in surgical technique and technologies will allow for improved success.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparisons of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a prospective cohort study with a 2-year follow-up
    Wu, Jingye
    Ao, Jintao
    Xu, Zhongning
    Li, Guanqing
    Ge, Tenghui
    Wang, Yongqing
    Tao, Xiaohui
    Tian, Wei
    Sun, Yuqing
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [22] Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after robot-assisted short-segment lumbar fusion with a minimum 1-year follow-up
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Lombardi, Joseph M.
    Boddapati, Venkat
    Mathew, Justin
    Leung, Eric
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 25
  • [23] Influence of Preoperative Difference in Lumbar Lordosis Between the Standing and Supine Positions on Clinical Outcomes After Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Minimum 2-year Follow-up
    Ohyama, Shuhei
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Kubota, Go
    Watanabe, Atsuya
    Nakajima, Takayuki
    Sato, Yusuke
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Nakajima, Arata
    Saito, Junya
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Nakagawa, Koichi
    Ohtori, Seiji
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (16) : 1070 - 1080
  • [24] Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3-to 4-year follow-up
    Rodriguez-Vela, Javier
    Lobo-Escolar, Antonio
    Joven, Eduardo
    Munoz-Marin, Javier
    Herrera, Antonio
    Velilla, Jose
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (12) : 2857 - 2863
  • [25] Comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single segmental lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimum two-year follow up
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Hu, Zhi-Chao
    Li, Xiao-Bin
    Feng, Zhen-Hua
    Chen, Dong
    Xu, Hui
    Huang, Qi-Shan
    Lin, Yan
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhao, Jie
    Ni, Wen-Fei
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [26] Long-term Durability of Minimal Invasive Posterior Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up
    Rouben, David
    Casnellie, Michael
    Ferguson, Michael
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (05): : 288 - 296
  • [27] Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Monocentric Study of 215 Patients With a Minimum of 4-Year Follow-up
    Liu, Fubing
    Feng, Zhenzhou
    Zhou, Xiaogang
    Liang, Yun
    Jiang, Chun
    Li, Xilei
    Li, Zheng
    Jiang, Xiaoxing
    Dong, Jian
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (06): : E776 - E783
  • [28] Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Minimally Invasive or Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
    Jia, Jun
    Chen, Cong
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Lianlei
    Liu, Xinyu
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (01): : E45 - E50
  • [29] Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Epidural Anesthesia: Technical Note and Initial Clinical Experience with One-Year Follow-Up
    Jiang, Chao
    Yin, Si
    Wei, Jianmin
    Zhao, Weigong
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Yongyuan
    Hao, Dingjun
    Du, Heng
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 3815 - 3826
  • [30] Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) compared with unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a 2-year follow-up study
    Cao, Shuyan
    Fan, Bingjie
    Song, Xin
    Wang, Yi
    Yin, Wenzhe
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)