Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up

被引:109
|
作者
Kolcun, John Paul G. [1 ]
Brusko, G. Damian [1 ]
Basil, Gregory W. [1 ]
Epstein, Richard [2 ]
Wang, Michael Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
lumbar fusion; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; awake fusion; enhanced recovery after surgery; length of stay; outcomes; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGERY; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.12.FOCUS18701
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Open spinal fusion surgery is often associated with significant blood loss, postoperative pain, and prolonged recovery times. Seeking to minimize surgical and perioperative morbidity, the authors adopted an endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) technique performed without general anesthesia. In this report, they present data on the first 100 patients treated with this procedure. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of the first 100 patients who underwent awake endoscopic MIS-TLIF at a single institution between 2014 and 2017. Surgery was performed while the patient was sedated but without intubation or the use of general anesthetic or narcotic agents. Long-lasting (liposomal) bupivacaine was used for local analgesia. The discectomy and placement of an expandable interbody graft were performed endoscopically, followed by percutaneous pedicle screw implantation. Inclusion criteria for the procedure consisted of diagnosis of degenerative disc disease with grade I or II spondylolisthesis and evidence of spinal stenosis or nerve impingement with intractable symptomatology. RESULTS Of the first 100 patients, 56 were female and 44 were male. Single-level fusion was performed in 84 patients and two-level fusion in 16 patients. The most commonly fused level was L4-5, representing 77% of all fused levels. The mean (+/- standard deviation) operative time was 84.5 +/- 21.7 minutes for one-level fusions and 128.1 +/- 48.6 minutes for two-level procedures. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 65.4 +/- 76.6 ml for one-level fusions and 74.7 +/- 33.6 ml for two-level fusions. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.4 +/- 1.0 days. Four deaths occurred in the 100 patients; all four of those patients died from complications unrelated to surgery. In 82% of the surviving patients, 1-year follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) data were available. The mean preoperative ODI score was 29.6 +/- 15.3 and the mean postoperative ODI score was 17.2 +/- 16.9, which represents a significant mean reduction in the ODI score of -12.3 using a two-tailed paired t-test (p = 0.000001). In four cases, the surgical plan was revised to include general endotracheal anesthesia intraoperatively and was successfully completed. Other complications included two cases of cage migration, one case of osteomyelitis, and one case of endplate fracture; three of these complications occurred in the first 50 cases. CONCLUSIONS This series of the first 100 patients to undergo awake endoscopic MIS-TLIF demonstrates outcomes comparable to those reported in our earlier papers. This procedure can provide a safe and efficacious option for lumbar fusion with less morbidity than open surgery. Further refinements in surgical technique and technologies will allow for improved success.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia: initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Grossman, Jay
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2016, 40 (02) : 1 - 5
  • [2] Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: technical innovations and outcomes
    Kolcun, John Paul G.
    Brusko, G. Damian
    Wang, Michael Y.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [3] Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up
    Park, Man-Kyu
    Park, Soo-An
    Son, Sang-Kyu
    Park, Weon-Wook
    Choi, Seung-Hyun
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 42 (03) : 753 - 761
  • [4] Comparison of the safety and efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: a 1-year follow-up
    Xie, Y. Z.
    Shi, Y.
    Zhou, Q.
    Feng, C. Q.
    Zhou, Y.
    Li, T.
    Yu, Y.
    Fan, X. H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [5] Comparison of Lumbosacral Fusion Grade in Patients after Transforaminal and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up
    Liu, Jinping
    Xie, Rong
    Chin, Cynthia T.
    Rajagopalan, Priya
    Duan, Ping-Guo
    Li, Bo
    Burch, Shane
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Chou, Dean
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (09) : 2334 - 2341
  • [6] Awake Robotic Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Study with 1-Year Follow-up
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.
    Garcia, Diogo
    Bojaxhi, Elird
    Buchanan, Ian A.
    Gruenbaum, Shaun E.
    Dagi, Teodoro Forcht
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 189 : E941 - E947
  • [7] Full-Endoscopic Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note With 1-Year Follow-Up
    Li, Zhen-Zhou
    Wang, Jin-Chang
    Cao, Zheng
    Zhao, Hong-Liang
    Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe
    Yeung, Anthony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (03) : 504 - 513
  • [8] Lumbar Lordosis Correction With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
    Mikula, Anthony L.
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Pennington, Zach
    Nassr, Ahmad
    Freedman, Brett
    Sebastian, Arjun S.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Elder, Benjamin D.
    Fogelson, Jeremy L.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E295 - E302
  • [9] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients
    Potter, BK
    Freedman, BA
    Verwiebe, EG
    Hall, JM
    Polly, DW
    Kuklo, TR
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 (04): : 337 - 346
  • [10] Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Jung, Byungjoo
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (06): : E302 - E309