Dose reduction methods for CT colonography

被引:33
作者
Chang, Kevin J. [1 ]
Yee, Judy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Rhode Isl Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 2013年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
CT colonography; Virtual colonoscopy; Radiation dose reduction; Dose reduction strategies; Automatic dose modulation; Iterative reconstruction; mAs; kVp; AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL; TUBE-CURRENT MODULATION; IMAGE QUALITY; HELICAL CT; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; PATIENT SIZE; COLORECTAL LESIONS; BODY CT; MDCT; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-012-9968-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients, referring physicians, the media, and government agencies have all expressed concern over the risks of medical radiation, particularly as it relates to CT. This concern is particularly paramount when associated with a screening examination such as CT colonography. These theoretical risks must be weighed realistically against the substantial benefits of colon cancer screening as well as against the risks inherent in the major alternative screening option, optical colonoscopy. When put into perspective, the risk-benefit ratio is highly in favor of the performance of CT colonography. Nevertheless, in following the ALARA principle, there is an ever increasing armamentarium of options that can be employed in the pursuit of CT radiation dose reduction, all of which can be used in many synergistic combinations allowing for dose reduction while simultaneously preserving image quality and minimizing image noise. After a brief tutorial on estimating radiation dose, various strategies will be discussed including reductions in tube current and tube voltage as well as the use of automatic dose modulation and iterative reconstruction. Other practical considerations will also be reviewed including proper patient isocentering, optimization of colonic insufflation to minimize additional decubitus scans, proper choice of scan volumes to avoid overranging, and variation of slice thickness and window width to minimize perceived image noise. Finally, a strategy for how to incrementally introduce these methods as well as a way to compare dose reduction efforts across institutions throughout the country will be offered.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Endoscopic perforation of the colon: Lessons from a 10-year study [J].
Anderson, ML ;
Pasha, TM ;
Leighton, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (12) :3418-3422
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, LIGHTSP VCT TECHN RE, P25
[3]   Mass screening with CT colonography: Should the radiation exposure be of concern? [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Georgsson, MA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 129 (01) :328-337
[4]   QUANTITATIVE THEORY OF HOUNSFIELD UNIT AND ITS APPLICATION TO DUAL ENERGY SCANNING [J].
BROOKS, RA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1977, 1 (04) :487-493
[5]  
Burk R., 2010, Radiation Risk in Perspective
[6]  
Chang KJ, 2013, RADIOLOGY IN PRESS
[7]   Dose Reduction in Helical CT: Dynamically Adjustable z-Axis X-Ray Beam Collimation [J].
Christner, Jodie A. ;
Zavaletta, Vanessa A. ;
Eusemann, Christian D. ;
Walz-Flannigan, Alisa I. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (01) :W49-W55
[8]   Feasibility of MDCT colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: Comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Vogt, C ;
Beck, A ;
Andersen, K ;
Heinen, W ;
vom Dahl, S ;
Aurich, V ;
Haeussinger, D ;
Moedder, U .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (05) :1355-1359
[9]  
Dachman A, 2010, ATLAS VIRTUAL COLONO, P103
[10]   Radiation-Related Cancer Risks From CT Colonography Screening: A Risk-Benefit Analysis [J].
de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington ;
Kim, Kwang Pyo ;
Knudsen, Amy B. ;
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris ;
Rutter, Carolyn M. ;
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ;
Yee, Judy ;
Kuntz, Karen M. ;
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ;
Zauber, Ann G. ;
Berg, Christine D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (04) :816-823