Young children can tell strategic lies after committing a transgression

被引:42
作者
Fu, Genyue [1 ]
Evans, Angela D. [2 ]
Xu, Fen [3 ]
Lee, Kang [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Brock Univ, Dept Psychol, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Child Study Human Dev & Child Psychol, OISE, Toronto, ON M5R 2X2, Canada
关键词
Deception; Tactical deception; Lying; Lie telling; Strategy; Children; Development; DECEPTION; MIND; METAANALYSIS; 2-YEAR-OLD; ABILITY; CONCEAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.003
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether young children make strategic decisions about whether to lie to conceal a transgression based on the lie recipient's knowledge. In Experiment 1,168 3- to 5-year-olds were asked not to peek at the toy in the experimenter's absence, and the majority of children peeked. Children were questioned about their transgression in either the presence or absence of an eyewitness of their transgression. Whereas 4- and 5-year-olds were able to adjust their decisions of whether to lie based on the presence or absence of the eyewitness, 3-year-olds did not. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated whether the lie recipient appeared to have learned information about children's peeking from an eyewitness or was merely bluffing. Results revealed that when the lie recipient appeared lobe genuinely knowledgeable about their transgression, even 3-year-olds were significantly less likely to lie compared with when the lie recipient appeared to be bluffing. Thus, preschool children are able to make strategic decisions about whether to lie or tell the truth based on whether the lie recipient is genuinely knowledgeable about the true state of affairs. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 158
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Bala Nicholas, 2005, Alta Law Rev, V42, P995
[2]   The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief [J].
Carlson, SM ;
Moses, LJ ;
Hix, HR .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 69 (03) :672-691
[3]   SMALL-SCALE DECEIT - DECEPTION AS A MARKER OF 2-YEAR-OLD, 3-YEAR-OLD, AND 4-YEAR-OLDS EARLY THEORIES OF MIND [J].
CHANDLER, M ;
FRITZ, AS ;
HALA, S .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1989, 60 (06) :1263-1277
[4]  
Darwin CR., 1877, Mind, V2, P285, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/OS-2.7.285
[5]   DECEPTION IN 3-YEAR-OLDS [J].
LEWIS, M ;
STANGER, C ;
SULLIVAN, MW .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 25 (03) :439-443
[6]  
Lewis M., 2000, BIENN M INT SOC STUD
[7]   Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding [J].
Milligan, Karen ;
Wilde Astington, Janet ;
Dack, Lisa Ain .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 78 (02) :622-646
[8]   Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests [J].
ONeill, DK .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 67 (02) :659-677
[9]  
Perner J, 1991, Understanding the representational mind
[10]   RUSE AND REPRESENTATIONS - ON CHILDRENS ABILITY TO CONCEAL INFORMATION [J].
PESKIN, J .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 28 (01) :84-89