Affordable gait analysis using augmented reality markers

被引:19
|
作者
Nagymate, Gergely [1 ]
Kiss, Rita M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Mechatron Opt & Mech Engn Informat, Budapest, Hungary
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 02期
基金
匈牙利科学研究基金会;
关键词
MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE; MOTION CAPTURE; PEOPLE; PARAMETERS; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; RELIABILITY; KINEMATICS; 3D;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0212319
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A typical optical based gait analysis laboratory uses expensive stereophotogrammetric motion capture systems. The study aims to propose and validate an affordable gait analysis method using augmented reality (AR) markers with a single action camera. Image processing software calculates the position and orientation of the AR markers. Anatomical landmark calibration is applied on the subject to calibrate each of the anatomical points with respect to their corresponding AR markers. This way, anatomical points are tracked through AR markers using homogeneous coordinate transformations, and the further processing of gait analysis is identical with conventional solutions. The proposed system was validated on nine participants of varying age using a conventional motion capture system on simultaneously measured treadmill gait trials on 2, 3 and 4.5 km/h walking speeds. Coordinates of the virtual anatomical points were compared using the Bland-Altman analysis. Spatial-temporal gait parameters (step length, stride length, walking base, cadence, pelvis range of motion) and angular gait parameters (range of motion of knee, hip and pelvis angles) were compared between measurement systems by RMS error and Bland-Altman analysis. The proposed method shows some differences in the raw coordinates of virtually tracked anatomical landmarks and gait parameters compared to the reference system. RMS errors of spatial parameters were below 23 mm, while the angular range of motion RMS errors varies from 2.55 degrees to 6.73 degrees. Some of these differences (e.g. knee angle range of motion) is comparable to previously reported differences between commercial motion capture systems and gait variability. The proposed method can be a very cheap gait analysis solution, but precision is not guaranteed for every aspect of gait analysis using the currently exemplified implementation of the AR marker tracking approach.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robust augmented reality guidance with fluorescent markers in laparoscopic surgery
    Wild, Esther
    Teber, Dogu
    Schmid, Daniel
    Simpfendoerfer, Tobias
    Mueller, Michael
    Baranski, Ann-Christin
    Kenngott, Hannes
    Kopka, Klaus
    Maier-Hein, Lena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2016, 11 (06) : 899 - 907
  • [42] Augmented Reality Microsurgery A Tool for Training Micromanipulations in Ophthalmic Surgery Using Augmented Reality
    Ropelato, Sandro
    Menozzi, Marino
    Michel, Dominique
    Siegrist, Michael
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2020, 15 (02): : 122 - 127
  • [43] Augmented Reality Visualization of Modal Analysis Using the Finite Element Method
    Erkek, Merve Yavuz
    Erkek, Selim
    Jamei, Elmira
    Seyedmahmoudian, Mehdi
    Stojcevski, Alex
    Horan, Ben
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (03): : 1 - 11
  • [44] Competitive Intelligence Analysis of Augmented Reality Technology Using Patent Information
    Jeong, Byeongki
    Yoon, Janghyeok
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [45] A Content Analysis on Articles Using Augmented Reality Technology and Infographic in Education
    Bicen, Huseyin
    Demir, Burak
    POSTMODERN OPENINGS, 2020, 11 (01): : 33 - 44
  • [46] Mapping the Educational Applications of Augmented Reality Research using A Bibliometric Analysis
    Maulana, Fairuz Iqbal
    Atmaji, Lutfi Tri
    Azis, Baskoro
    Hidayati, Awanis
    Ramdania, Diena Rauda
    2021 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING (ICEEIE 2021), 2021, : 139 - 144
  • [47] TEACHING ARCHEOLOGY USING MIXED REALITY, AUGMENTED REALITY, VIRTUAL REALITY
    Fasolo, Michele
    ARCHEOMATICA-TECNOLOGIE PER I BENI CULTURALI, 2020, 11 (01): : 5 - 5
  • [48] Using Augmented Reality Technology in Pathfinding
    Abuhashish, Faris
    Kolivand, Hoshang
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE DEVELOPMENTS IN ESYSTEMS ENGINEERING (DESE 2019), 2019, : 1042 - 1046
  • [49] Using virtual and augmented reality in the library
    Massis, Bruce
    NEW LIBRARY WORLD, 2015, 116 (11-12) : 796 - 799
  • [50] Remote Service Using Augmented Reality
    Lofvendahl, Bjorn
    ERCIM NEWS, 2016, (105): : 25 - 25