Breaking the rules? A corpus-based comparison of informal features in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing

被引:10
|
作者
Lee, Joseph J. [1 ]
Bychkovska, Tetyana [2 ]
Maxwell, James D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Dept Linguist, ELIP Acad & Global Commun Program, 383 Gordy Hall, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept English, MSN 3E4,4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] Ohio Univ, Dept Linguist, 383 Gordy Hall, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
Formality; Academic writing; Argumentative essays; Corpus analysis; First-year writing; METADISCOURSE; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2018.11.010
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study reports findings of a comparative corpus-based analysis of informality in L1 and L2 undergraduate student argumentative essays. Data consist of two corpora of student essays: 101 high-rated essays written by L1-English students and 254 high-rated essays written by ESL students in US universities. Based on a taxonomy of the 10 most common informal features cited in style manuals, we compared informal language use in L1-English and ESL undergraduate student essays. Results reveal that overall frequency of informal features is significantly greater in L2 student texts. Findings also indicate that both groups rely on similar informal elements, yet they differ in distinct ways. While ESL student writers tend to employ significantly more anaphoric pronoun it and second-person pronouns, they use most other types less frequently than L1 writers, and generally appear to observe prescriptive rules more strictly. In contrast, L1-English writers tend to adopt a more liberal attitude toward these rules, employing a broader range of informal types, particularly those that have become relatively legitimized in academic writing. The paper concludes with implications for ESL composition pedagogy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Can and Could in Academic Writing: A Corpus-Driven Comparison of English L1 and Vietnamese EFL Students
    Whitty, Lauren
    Parkinson, Jean
    Ha Thi Phuong Pham
    JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2022, 19 (01): : 93 - 108
  • [22] Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives
    Candarli, Duygu
    Bayyurt, Yasemin
    Marti, Leyla
    JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2015, 20 : 192 - 202
  • [23] Syntactic and lexical features of adolescent L2 students' academic writing
    Maamuujav, Undarmaa
    Olson, Carol Booth
    Chung, Huy
    JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2021, 53
  • [25] Stance construction via that-clauses in telecommunications research articles: a comparison of L1 and L2 expert writers
    Wu, Juanjuan
    Pan, Fan
    TEXT & TALK, 2024, 44 (03) : 387 - 410
  • [27] Collocational Links in the L2 Mental Lexicon and the Influence of L1 Intralexical Knowledge
    Wolter, Brent
    Gyllstad, Henrik
    APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2011, 32 (04) : 430 - 449
  • [28] "How can I add an argument appropriately in English?" Addition markers in Chinese L1 and English L1 university student writing
    Han, Chao
    Gardner, Sheena
    JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2024, 67
  • [29] Lexical Bundles of L1 and L2 English Professional Scholars: A Contrastive Corpus-Driven Study on Applied Linguistics Research Articles
    Al Fajri, Muchamad Sholakhuddin
    Kirana, Angkita Wasito
    Putri, Celya Intan Kharisma
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2020, 6 (04): : 76 - 89
  • [30] The modality switching costs of Chinese-English bilinguals in the processing of L1 and L2
    Zhao, Tianyang
    Huang, Yanli
    Chen, Donggui
    Jiao, Lu
    Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando
    Wang, Ruiming
    Xie, Jiushu
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (03) : 396 - 412