A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction

被引:43
|
作者
Erbe, Malena [1 ]
Gredler, Birgit [2 ]
Seefried, Franz Reinhold [2 ]
Bapst, Beat [2 ]
Simianer, Henner [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Anim Sci, Anim Breeding & Genet Grp, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Qualitas AG, Zug, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
BREEDING VALUES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; SELECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0081046
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Prediction of genomic breeding values is of major practical relevance in dairy cattle breeding. Deterministic equations have been suggested to predict the accuracy of genomic breeding values in a given design which are based on training set size, reliability of phenotypes, and the number of independent chromosome segments (Me). The aim of our study was to find a general deterministic equation for the average accuracy of genomic breeding values that also accounts for marker density and can be fitted empirically. Two data sets of similar to 698 Holstein Friesian bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and 19332 Brown Swiss bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and imputed to,600 K SNPs were available. Different k-fold (k = 2-10, 15, 20) cross-validation scenarios (50 replicates, random assignment) were performed using a genomic BLUP approach. A maximum likelihood approach was used to estimate the parameters of different prediction equations. The highest likelihood was obtained when using a modified form of the deterministic equation of Daetwyler et al. (2010), augmented by a weighting factor (w) based on the assumption that the maximum achievable accuracy is w < 1. The proportion of genetic variance captured by the complete SNP sets (w(2)) was 0.76 to 0.82 for Holstein Friesian and 0.72 to 0.75 for Brown Swiss. When modifying the number of SNPs, w was found to be proportional to the log of the marker density up to a limit which is population and trait specific and was found to be reached with,209000 SNPs in the Brown Swiss population studied.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genomic Prediction in Pea: Effect of Marker Density and Training Population Size and Composition on Prediction Accuracy
    Tayeh, Nadim
    Klein, Anthony
    Le Paslier, Marie-Christine
    Jacquin, Francoise
    Houtin, Herve
    Rond, Celine
    Chabert-Martinello, Marianne
    Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard
    Marget, Pascal
    Aubert, Gregoire
    Burstin, Judith
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 6
  • [2] Effects of SNP marker density and training population size on prediction accuracy in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genomic selection
    Wang, Hu
    Bai, Yuguang
    Biligetu, Bill
    PLANT GENOME, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [3] Sample size determination for training set optimization in genomic prediction
    Wu, Po-Ya
    Ou, Jen-Hsiang
    Liao, Chen-Tuo
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2023, 136 (03)
  • [4] Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels
    Zhang, Z.
    Ding, X.
    Liu, J.
    Zhang, Q.
    de Koning, D. -J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (07) : 3642 - 3650
  • [5] Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection
    Schopp, Pascal
    Riedelsheimer, Christian
    Utz, H. Friedrich
    Schoen, Chris-Carolin
    Melchinger, Albrecht E.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2015, 128 (11) : 2189 - 2201
  • [6] The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
    Edwards, Stefan McKinnon
    Buntjer, Jaap B.
    Jackson, Robert
    Bentley, Alison R.
    Lage, Jacob
    Byrne, Ed
    Burt, Chris
    Jack, Peter
    Berry, Simon
    Flatman, Edward
    Poupard, Bruno
    Smith, Stephen
    Hayes, Charlotte
    Gaynor, R. Chris
    Gorjanc, Gregor
    Howell, Phil
    Ober, Eric
    Mackay, Ian J.
    Hickey, John M.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2019, 132 (07) : 1943 - 1952
  • [7] Accuracy of genomic prediction using mixed low-density marker panels
    Hou, Lianjie
    Liang, Wenshuai
    Xu, Guli
    Huang, Bo
    Zhang, Xiquan
    Hu, Ching Yuan
    Wang, Chong
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2020, 60 (08) : 999 - 1007
  • [8] Effect of marker-data editing on the accuracy of genomic prediction
    Edriss, V.
    Guldbrandtsen, B.
    Lund, M. S.
    Su, G.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2013, 130 (02) : 128 - 135
  • [9] Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
    Wang, Quanchao
    Yu, Yang
    Yuan, Jianbo
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    Huang, Hao
    Li, Fuhua
    Xiang, Jianhai
    BMC GENETICS, 2017, 18
  • [10] Exploring the size of reference population for expected accuracy of genomic prediction using simulated and real data in Japanese Black cattle
    Takeda, Masayuki
    Inoue, Keiichi
    Oyama, Hidemi
    Uchiyama, Katsuo
    Yoshinari, Kanako
    Sasago, Nanae
    Kojima, Takatoshi
    Kashima, Masashi
    Suzuki, Hiromi
    Kamata, Takehiro
    Kumagai, Masahiro
    Takasugi, Wataru
    Aonuma, Tatsuya
    Soma, Yuusuke
    Konno, Sachi
    Saito, Takaaki
    Ishida, Mana
    Muraki, Eiji
    Inoue, Yoshinobu
    Takayama, Megumi
    Nariai, Shota
    Hideshima, Ryoya
    Nakamura, Ryoichi
    Nishikawa, Sayuri
    Kobayashi, Hiroshi
    Shibata, Eri
    Yamamoto, Koji
    Yoshimura, Kenichi
    Matsuda, Hironori
    Inoue, Tetsuro
    Fujita, Atsumi
    Terayama, Shohei
    Inoue, Kazuya
    Morita, Sayuri
    Nakashima, Ryotaro
    Suezawa, Ryohei
    Hanamure, Takeshi
    Zoda, Atsushi
    Uemoto, Yoshinobu
    BMC GENOMICS, 2021, 22 (01)