Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:32
作者
Chang, Nicholas [1 ]
Furey, Andrew [1 ]
Kurdin, Anton [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ, Div Orthopaed Surg, Dept Surg, Fac Med, St John, NF, Canada
关键词
acromioclavicular; dislocation; systematic review; meta-analysis; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; JOINT; RELIABILITY; SEPARATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000001004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Management of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations has been controversial. Recent studies suggest no difference in outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of Rockwood types III-V injuries. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of high-grade AC joint dislocations. Data Sources: Search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through October 2016. A broad search strategy was used to identify English, comparative studies of AC joint dislocations. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria included comparative studies of AC joint dislocations in adult patients with acute, high-grade AC dislocations. Data Extraction: Two authors independently reviewed and assessed for bias according to the U.S. Preventative Task Force Quality Rating Criteria. Data were extracted for validated functional scores, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications. Data Synthesis: Nineteen studies (n = 954) were included in the meta-analysis. Operative group had better cosmetic outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.05; P < 0.00001) and radiographic reduction (OR = 24.94; P < 0.0001). Constant scores favored the operative group, although the difference may not be clinically significant (MD = 3.14; P = 0.03). Nonoperative treatment was associated with faster return to work (MD = 4.17, P < 0.0001), lower implant complications (OR = 7.19, P < 0.0001), and reduced infection rate (OR = 3.65, P = 0.007). No difference was found for DASH Score, return to sport, radiologic evidence of osteoarthritis, and need for surgery after failed management. Conclusions: No clinical difference in functional outcome scores was detected between operative and nonoperative management of high-grade AC joint dislocations. Patients in the nonoperative cohort had a more rapid return to work, but were associated with a poorer cosmetic outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [11] Reliability of the classification and treatment of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint
    Cho, Chul-Hyun
    Hwang, Ilseon
    Seo, Jae-Sung
    Choi, Chang-Hyuk
    Ko, Sang-Hun
    Park, Hyung Bin
    Dan, Jinmyoung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (05) : 665 - 670
  • [12] Rehabilitation of Acromioclavicular Joint Separations: Operative and Nonoperative Considerations
    Cote, Mark P.
    Wojcik, Karen E.
    Gomlinski, Gregg
    Mazzocca, Augustus D.
    [J]. CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (02) : 213 - +
  • [13] Comparison of Surgical Treatment and Conservative Approach for Type III Acromioclavicular Dislocations
    Esen, Erdinc
    Ozturk, Akif Muhtar
    Dogramaci, Yunus
    Kanatli, Ulunay
    Bolukbasi, Selcuk
    [J]. TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2011, 31 (01): : 109 - 114
  • [14] Complete dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint: operative versus conservative treatment
    Fremerey, R.
    Freitag, N.
    Bosch, U.
    Lobenhoffer, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2005, 6 (04) : 174 - 178
  • [15] GALPIN RD, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P150
  • [16] Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: Surgical versus conservative treatment
    Gstettner, C.
    Tauber, M.
    Hitzl, W.
    Resch, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2008, 17 (02) : 220 - 225
  • [17] ACUTE, COMPLETE ACROMIOCLAVICULAR SEPARATION
    IMATANI, RJ
    HANLON, JJ
    CADY, GW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1975, A 57 (03) : 328 - 332
  • [18] Results of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Rockwood Types III and V Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation A Prospective, Randomized Trial With an 18- to 20-Year Follow-up
    Joukainen, Antti
    Kroger, Heikki
    Niemitukia, Lea
    Makela, E. Antero
    Vaatainen, Urho
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (12): : 1 - 9
  • [19] Operative or conservative treatment in patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and update of current literature
    Korsten, Koos
    Gunning, Amy C.
    Leenen, Luke P. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (04) : 831 - 838
  • [20] Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of the Radiographic Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Separations
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Williams, Gerald R., Jr.
    Cohen, Steven B.
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    Tucker, Bradford S.
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Altchek, David W.
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (10) : E1483 - E1487